Albinder Altman & Block LLP

Legislation signed into law by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo on June 30
imposes a cap on property tax increases for local government entities, including
counties, local municipalities and school districts.

The cap will provide relief
for New Yorkers burdened by “backbreaking” property taxes, Cuomo said in a statement, which are 96 percent higher than the rest of the
country -- a median $3,755 in New York vs. $1,917 nationwide.

The new law forbids local
entities from increasing their property tax levies by more than either 2 percent
annually or the rate of inflation -- whichever is lower -- beginning with the
fiscal year that starts in 2012.

The new law may serve as a
check on local property assessors whose judgments may sometimes seem arbitrary,
said Edmund Viele, a member of the Taxation of Individuals Committee, who added that a cap will
also allow property owners to forecast cash flows more accurately.

Alfred Grillo, chair of the
NYSSCPA’s New York, Multistate and Local Taxation Committee, made a
similar point, saying that having a property tax cap makes tax planning easier,
as people will no longer be surprised by “large increases out of the
blue.”

This cap could encourage
real estate development and purchases on both the commercial and residential
side, Viele said.

“Skyrocketing” property tax
costs have impeded growth, said Harry Dublinsky, chair of the Real Estate Committee, who noted that the rates make both
commercial and residential real estate buyers hesitant about purchasing property
in New York. A property tax cap makes it less expensive for this kind of
investment, he said.

While he acknowledged that
local government entities often have costs that are beyond their control, having
a cap in place can help the real estate industry reposition itself. Dublinsky
added that having a cap in place sends a message to businesses that New York is
working to make itself a friendlier environment for development.

“I believe this is
definitely a positive move,” said Dublinsky.

This part of the legislation
goes into effect at the beginning of municipal governments’ and school
districts’ 2012 fiscal year.

Skeptics

Not everyone is happy with
the bill’s passage, namely those in municipalities that will have to cut
services as a result of reduced tax revenue. In addition to the services over
which the entities have direct control, such as police or public works, local
governments must also contend with a number of fixed costs, such as local worker
pensions, regardless of how much money is available, said NYSSCPA
Secretary/Treasurer Scott M. Adair, a member of the Government Accounting and Auditing Committee and CFO of the
Monroe County Department of Finance. Many local governments are also locked into
multiyear union contracts that were negotiated before the property tax cap was
passed into law.

However, the law allows the
cap to be exceeded to pay for growth in pension costs in the event that the
contribution rate increases by more than 2 percent from the previous year. In
such a case, the amount of contributions above that 2 percent figure will be
excluded from the limit.

The cap could also be
exceeded if a local governing body were to pass a new law with at least
two-thirds of the vote by the governing body or, in the case of school
districts, 60 percent of the voters in a referendum. Local entities can also
exceed the cap by up to 5 percent if a court order or judgment rising out of a
tort action requires it. Further, if a local entity manages to budget under the
cap one year, it may take the difference and increase its cap by that much the
following year. It may also adjust the cap upward to account for growth in the
property tax base during the course of the year, by a factor calculated by the
commissioner of tax and finance.

It is this last exception
that makes Kenneth B. Laks, a Suffolk Chapter member who cochairs his chapter’s General Taxation Committee, skeptical that the cap will
provide real relief to New Yorkers. He noted that pension costs for government
workers is a large part of a resident’s tax bill, and it grows every year, so
“if they allow the cap to not apply to the pension costs, then what’s the point?
We’re right back where we started from. “There’s too many loopholes,” Laks
said.

New Jersey implemented a 2
percent property tax cap last year. Like New York, local government entities in
New Jersey are subject to a number of rising cost factors beyond their control,
such as the status of union contracts, the price of gasoline and rising
insurance rates.

“Towns had to adapt to the
cap whether they wanted to or not,” and so having to accommodate this cap while,
at the same time, fulfilling all the costs out of their control made “many towns
[feel] somewhat helpless,” said Chuck Chiarello, the mayor of Buena Vista
Township, N.J., and the president of the New Jersey League of
Municipalities.

One thing that the property
tax cap did do, however, was force New Jersey’s local government entities to
reexamine their programs and work toward greater efficiency, he said. Because of
the large number of entities that need funding, though, tax bills are still
increasing. The property tax cap, he said, didn’t so much bring relief, but hold
the line on individual tax bills.

Isn’t holding the line the
point of a property tax cap? asked Grillo, who noted that while people don’t
need to pay income taxes if they’re not getting any income, property taxes,
however, must be paid no matter what -- even if the taxpayer is recently
unemployed, is a business owner who had a bad year or is a senior on a fixed
income.

“It could keep going up even
if you’re not making money, so it’s a very difficult [tax],” said Grillo. “As a
taxpayer, I would rather pay the income tax than keep seeing property taxes go
sky-high.” Enhancing efficiency in government is another laudable aspect of the
cap, Grillo said, adding that many governments have multiple areas where waste
can be cut back or positions streamlined.

“How many administrators do
you need earning half a million dollars?” he said.

School districts face
challenges similar to those of local governments in that the amount of money
over which they have direct control is quite small compared to the amount that
is required to go toward various mandates by the state and local governments,
such as funding for special education, according to Brian Butry, communications
coordinator for the New York State School Boards Association. Because money
can’t be cut from these areas to bring budgets under the cap, he said that
schools will likely make cuts to services such as tutoring and extracurricular
activities, and programs like the arts.

Other
Provisions

In addition to establishing
the 2 percent property tax cap, the bill also includes a provision that is
intended to increase the number of rent-stabilized residences in New York.
Landlords are currently allowed to turn rent-stabilized apartments into standard
market units once the regulated rent reaches $2,000 per month for vacant units,
and $2,000 per month for units occupied by tenants with a combined income of
$175,000 or more for two consecutive years. The bill increases this threshold to
$2,500 for vacant units and $2,500 for units occupied by tenants with an income
of $200,000 or more for two consecutive years. This provision of the bill took
effect upon signage of the law, and is applied retroactively as of June 24,
2010.

The bill also has measures
intended to make it easier for local government entities to cut costs. For
example, local municipalities and public authorities would be authorized to
exchange services, material and equipment; the competitive bidding threshold for
highway improvements would go from $100,000 to $250,000; municipalities would
have the expanded ability to use their own labor for highway improvements; and
they would no longer be bound by statutory salary requirements for municipal
chiefs of police

Close

Tax reform legislation widely known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The TCJA brought forth the most sweeping overhaul of the U.S. tax code in over 30 years. However, widespread efforts to implement the TCJA amidst ongoing tax-related global developments continue to this day. Now, two years following its enactment, Treasury, the IRS, and the tax community remain steadfast in working toward understanding and communicating congressional intent under the new law.

The Tax Council Policy Institute (TCPI), a nonprofit, non-partisan public policy research and educational organization, will devote its 21st Annual Tax Policy & Practice Symposium to reviewing the current state of U.S. tax law and how it may continue to evolve, when it presents "Hindsight is 2020: What the TCJA and Global Developments Tell us About the Future of Tax" (February 13-14, 2020).

Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting sat down recently with two principal organizers of this year’s TCPI Symposium to preview some of the issues that will be discussed. Lynda K. Walker, Esq., is executive director and general counsel of TCPI. John Gimigliano is principal-in-charge of legislative and regulatory services in the Washington National Tax practice of KPMG LLP and former senior tax counsel for the House Ways and Means Committee. KPMG is program manager for the 2020 TCPI Symposium.

Wolters Kluwer: As the name of this year’s symposium reflects, hindsight is 20/20. Are there any particular policy choices made two years ago under the TCJA that standout now as being either well-matched or less than ideal for the functionality of the current U.S. tax system as it relates to domestic as well as multinational business?

Lynda K. Walker: Tax law is constantly evolving, and it seems now more rapidly than ever. Congress and the business community worked for years to advance some of the concepts in the TCJA, particularly the necessity of lower rates for global competitiveness. Enactment of the major overhaul of the business tax system within that legislation was met with much enthusiasm, but it is not the end of the challenge. Promulgation of regulations—an ongoing process—as well as implementation of those rules and the administration of them are major areas of focus for tax executives and will be covered extensively at our upcoming conference. We have designed this symposium’s program to examine how well the tax system is working to meet the goals that Congress was looking to achieve given the passage of time and the practical application of the law. The experts speaking at the symposium are from various fields and bring varying perspectives. We hope to provide our attendees with the gamut of expert thought on the issues of current interest. The program also strives to bring some new understanding to both external and internal pressures on our tax system(s) in the U.S. and globally, not only currently but prospectively.

John Gimigliano: In some ways it is almost too early to know, being only one complete tax filing season in, but that is part of what we are trying to explore by bringing together the experts at the symposium. Although the TCJA was a partisan piece of legislation and there were people that claimed it did or did not do certain things, hopefully we can now put that aside and evaluate what the law does and does not do, and maybe we now have enough experience with it to make those determinations.

Wolters Kluwer: As you mentioned, internal and external pressures on the federal tax system will be examined during the symposium. What are some examples of internal and external forces that affect tax policy generally?

John Gimigliano: You can look at budgetary and political pressures as key internal forces that affect all tax policy. As I said, the TCJA was a Republican bill, and Democrats have made it pretty clear that they have issues with not only how it was enacted but also the substance of the bill. We saw these internal, political pressures manifest especially because we had an election since the enactment of the TCJA, and the House has gone from Republican to Democratic-controlled. That is not to suggest cause and effect, but it does change the potential for changes to the system that was enacted in December of 2017. And, of course there is another big election looming that could change that political calculus again. As for external pressures, the most notable one is the work being done at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to address the digital economy and the opportunity to change international tax rules pretty dramatically in a way that was not envisioned when the TCJA was negotiated, drafted, and enacted. Additionally, there are external trade pressures at work on the tax system. There has always been a fine line between tax and trade policy, and if we have dramatic changes in trade policy, it could certainly trickle over to the tax side.

Lynda K. Walker: Currently, we are seeing a recognition of the correlation between tax and trade policy that is vastly different from a few years ago. Among our peers in the tax policy community, we now talk about tax and trade as related in a way that seems to have more common acceptance than in the past. There is a convergence of these other global issues on tax policy in a very distinguishable way that is a big potential external pressure.

Wolters Kluwer: Can you touch upon the importance of businesses staying informed of the direction the OECD will go with regard to reforms to international tax standards?

Lynda K. Walker: It is really important that businesses pay very close attention to what is going on in the OECD, the European Union (EU), and other economic blocks around the world, perhaps now more than ever. During the time we were debating tax reform in this country, other countries began to move in their efforts to broaden their tax bases. We were occupied with tax reform, and their tax proposals and efforts were moving forward. Moreover, tax executives need certainty—and the whole debate and movement toward multilateral agreements from bilateral and unilateral jurisdictional action could be a forbearer to another regime in global taxation. It is important that taxpayers be part of the dialogue and that business has a seat at the table with government as matters that could have a sweeping impact on where and how business is conducted are discussed and determined.

Wolters Kluwer: As TCPI materials noted, the symposium is expected to highlight the "real world" effects of the TCJA and how it has changed thinking about global investment. What might a preview of this discussion include?

John Gimigliano: Now stepping away from the theoretical of enactment and all the things the TCJA may or may not do, it is important to examine what it means now to be a tax professional. With two years of experience with the TCJA, what does it really do, and how does it change the decisions that tax directors have to make as to whether, when, or where to buy equipment or to develop intellectual property? Those are the kind of questions we are hoping to address with this real world application of our experience with the TCJA.

Wolters Kluwer: Generally, have the regulations promulgated since passage of the TCJA succeeded in clarifying complex provisions of the statute?

Lynda K. Walker: The TCJA is so broad and impacts so much of the tax code, it really does seem like we are relying heavily on regulations, which we always do in the tax world, but we still need a lot more explanation on some of the TCJA provisions. I am sure it has been a challenge for the IRS, and we are very happy that we will have Michael J. Desmond, IRS chief counsel, with us for this symposium to provide some insight into how the IRS has proceeded and plans to continue to move forward with guidance.

John Gimigliano: This is the challenge of being in the executive branch and getting a piece of legislation handed to you and trying to make it work. As a former tax writer, it is often easier to write these provisions in the abstract, but it is so much more challenging in various ways to make sure that it works for taxpayers and that it is administrable by the IRS. You do not want to put the IRS in a position to fail with a provision that ultimately is impossible to administer. These are the challenges that the IRS has, and so far, by all accounts, both Treasury and the IRS have done a pretty good job. But there’s still so much left to do.

Wolters Kluwer: As for any particular provisions, especially those with final regulations, that may still carry uncertainty for taxpayers and practitioners, what might generally be the way to approach the conundrum?

John Gimigliano: I could point to many of the TCJA regulations that are finalized and still say that there are unanswered questions and that people are going to have to make judgment calls. That has always been the case with tax; there are always judgment calls to be made. There is no statute and no regulation that can ever anticipate every fact pattern. So, people will do their best to analyze the rules and examples provided but will ultimately have to make judgment calls.

Wolters Kluwer: How should U.S. businesses prepare for potential changes in tax policy after the elections?

Lynda K. Walker: Businesses should stay engaged in the process with policy makers and groups like TCPI. Tax executives should engage in the discussion, and never think tax law is static. Taxpayers should be prepared for government to revisit the tax code as fiscal and economic needs change, and be prepared to navigate those waters as they shift.

Wolters Kluwer: Can the current corporate tax rate really be considered "permanent" just because it was enacted as such under the TCJA, or is it a relatively impermanent feature of the tax code just like others, largely dependent upon which Party has the White House and majority in Congress?

Lynda K. Walker: It is definitely fair to say that there will be pressure put on the rate as well as the tax code in general, because both Parties have objectives that require money. I do not know that anyone believes anything in the tax code is absolutely written in stone. That is part of the challenge for business in that they need some level of certainty to make long-term business and investment decisions, and to have major changes on an ongoing basis does not provide that certainty.

John Gimigliano: Permanence is an illusion; nothing is permanent. And even temporary policy is somewhat misleading. Take for example the R&D tax credit that was finally made permanent after being considered temporary tax policy for over 30 years. These are all relative terms.

Wolters Kluwer: What are you hoping the symposium accomplishes?

Lynda K. Walker: We hope that this program accomplishes our mission, which is to bring about a stronger and better understanding of federal tax policies and how they impact business and the economy as a whole. We hope this brings some careful study to the forefront through active evaluation and open discussion so that people leave more engaged and perhaps more aware. In our programs, our goal is always to have as inclusive a dialogue as possible by engaging all the critical stakeholders, including government, business, and academia. We work diligently to elevate the discourse on issues where we all might not have exactly the same frame of reference but hopefully the same goal, which is a thriving economy where business can operate under fair and transparent tax laws.

John Gimigliano: I hope we can advance taxpayers’ and practitioners’ understanding of the TCJA. We have all had so many questions since its enactment in late 2017. Now with a little bit of time, hopefully by gathering these experts together and in keeping with TCPI’s mission, it will advance everyone’s understanding of the law—where it is working, where it is not, and what changes are likely to come.

For more information on the 2020 TCPI Symposium, go to https://www.tcpi.org/event/21st-annual-tax-policy-and-practice-symposium/.

Close

On February 11, the White House released President Donald Trump’s fiscal year (FY) 2021 budget proposal, which outlines his administration’s priorities for extending certain tax cuts and increasing IRS funding. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testified before the Senate Finance Committee (SFC) on February 12 regarding the FY 2021 budget proposal.

Extension of TCJA’s Individual Tax Cuts
Trump’s FY 2021 budget proposal indicates that tax cuts for individuals and passthrough entities under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), which are set to expire at the end of 2025, would be extended. This extension is estimated to cost $1.4 trillion over 10 years, and is reportedly being used as a "placeholder" in the budget for Trump’s forthcoming "Tax Cuts 2.0" plan.

Infrastructure
Trump’s budget proposal also calls for a $1 trillion infrastructure package, although funding details remain scarce at this time. In January, House Democrats unveiled their infrastructure proposal, which also lacked funding details.

IRS Funding
Additionally, Trump’s budget proposes $12 billion in base funding for the IRS "to modernize the taxpayer experience and ensure that the IRS can fulfill its core tax filing season responsibilities." The budget proposal would boost IRS funding from currently enacted levels of $11.5 billion.

Further, the budget would provide $300 million to continue the IRS’s modernization efforts. Specifically, the budget proposal states that IRS funding would help to:

digitize more IRS communications to taxpayers, so they can respond quickly and accurately to IRS questions;
create a call-back function for certain IRS telephone lines, so taxpayers do not need to wait on hold to speak with an IRS representative; and
make it easier for taxpayers to make and schedule payments online.

Hill Reaction
"The Trump Economy stands firm on the proven pro-growth pillars of tax cuts, deregulation, energy independence, and better trade deals," the budget proposal states. However, Democratic lawmakers, while highlighting criticisms of the TCJA, are all but promising Trump’s budget request will not become law.

"Repealing incentives to reduce carbon emissions will hinder our fight against climate change and deter the kind of innovation our planet needs. And extending misguided tax cuts for the richest Americans will only deepen the deficit and further concentrate wealth at the top," House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., said in a statement after the budget proposal was released.

"It [Trump’s budget proposal] doubles down on the failed 2017 GOP tax law, extending expiring provisions and adding $1.5 trillion more to debt over the last six years of the budget window. Most of this extension’s tax breaks go to the richest one-fifth of households," House Budget Committee Democrats said in a committee report during the week of February 10.

However, it is worth noting that Trump’s budget proposal is merely an annual starting point for budget negotiations as Congress has the "power of the purse." Additionally, many of Trump’s requests, particularly those that include extending TCJA tax cuts, would have little chance of successfully clearing the currently Democratic-controlled House.

SFC Hearing; Wyden Bill
Secretary Mnuchin spent much of the SFC hearing praising and defending the TCJA and Treasury’s implementation of the GOP law. "Tax cuts, regulatory reform, and better trade deals are improving the lives of hardworking Americans," Mnuchin told lawmakers. "Unemployment remains historically low at 3.6 percent and is at or near all-time lows for African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and veterans. The unemployment rate for women recently reached its lowest point in nearly 70 years," he added.

Likewise, SFC Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa praised the TCJA and pointed to the same statistics mentioned by Mnuchin as evidence of its success. "Statistics like these show the tax reform is a success. The Treasury Department’s work to implement the new tax law has been an important part of that success," Grassley said.

However, SFC ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., did not mince words when criticizing Mnuchin’s leadership of Treasury, the TCJA, and related regulations. "It sure looks like corporate special interests are going to make off with new loopholes worth $100 billion in addition to their outlandish share of the original $2 trillion Trump tax law," Wyden said during his opening statement. "When people say the tax code is rigged and the Trump administration has made it worse, what I’ve described is a textbook case of what they are talking about."

In that vein, Wyden introduced a bill on February 12 which would block Treasury’s "exception to the new tax on foreign earnings that allows multinationals to essentially choose the lowest available tax rate," as noted in Wyden’s press release. During the hearing, Wyden accused Treasury of creating a new "corporate tax loophole." Generally, Wyden’s bill would amend the tax code to clarify that high-taxed amounts are excluded from tested income for purposes of determining global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) only if such amounts would be foreign base company income or insurance income.

Recently, Democrats have been criticizing Treasury for proposing related GILTI regulations based on corporate interests, but Mnuchin vehemently denied that claim. "Our job is to implement the legislation, not to make the legislation," he told lawmakers during the hearing. "Our job has been to implement that part of the tax code consistent with the intent and as prescribed by the law and that is what we have done."

Energy Tax Policy
Meanwhile, on the other side of the Capitol, in a February 11 letter to Senator Grassley, nearly 30 Democratic senators called for prompt committee action on energy tax policy. "Despite numerous opportunities, including in the recent tax extenders package, the Finance Committee has failed to take action on the dozens of energy tax proposals pending before it," the senators wrote in the letter led by Wyden. "Energy tax incentives have played a key part in shaping U.S. energy policy for more than 100 years, and members have shown clear interest in re-examining that ongoing role."

Close

House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure, "Moving Forward Framework"; House Ways and Means Committee, January 29 hearing witnesses’ testimony

House Democrats on January 29 unveiled their framework for a $760 billion infrastructure plan. Meanwhile, the House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing the same day to examine proposals for funding infrastructure and various "tools" within the Tax Code to encourage investment.

Democratic Infrastructure Framework
Notably, House Democrats’ infrastructure framework, which also contains proposals related to climate change, is considered on Capitol Hill as an opening bid. It is not legislative text, and it does not include any specificities on how to fund infrastructure.

"I think it is really important that we not volunteer a revenue stream until the administration reaches an agreement with us," House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., said in a January 29 news conference. President Donald Trump and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin have both expressed a readiness to move forward on infrastructure.

Ways and Means Infrastructure Hearing
Among some of the funding proposals presented during the January 29 hearing, Neal emphasized his preference for tax-preferred bonds. "Tax-preferred bonds are one of our most powerful tools. When we invest in infrastructure, it results in a significant economic multiplier," Neal said in his opening statement at the hearing. To that end, some witnesses also testified in support of reinstating a program known as Build American Bonds (BABs) on a permanent basis to help finance infrastructure. Neal likewise expressed his support for reinstating BABs.

Additionally, some Democratic lawmakers have discussed raising taxes to help fund infrastructure, namely the federal gas excise tax. Although the move would be met with resistance by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, Republicans are particularly vocal in their opposition. The last gas tax increase occurred in 1993.

"Workers who are driving used cars shouldn’t be paying higher taxes at the pump so that the wealthy can claim a tax credit for their $75,000 electric vehicles," ranking member Kevin Brady, R-Tex., said during the hearing. "Both will drive on roads and bridges but only the blue-collar worker will pay any taxes to maintain them."

Looking Ahead
Although infrastructure is indeed a priority among congressional tax writers and the Trump administration, the Democratic framework is largely seen as a campaign-related proposal ahead of the 2020 elections, quite similar to Republicans’ talk of "Tax Cuts 2.0." While lawmakers on both sides of the aisle and the U.S. Capitol are certainly eager to address these tax-related issues, it remains to be seen if requisite bipartisan agreement will be reached during an election year and a shortened legislative calendar.

Close

House Democratic and Republican tax writers debated the effects of tax reform’s corporate income tax cut during a February 11 hearing convened by Democrats. Democratic lawmakers have consistently called for an increase in the corporate tax rate since it was lowered from 35 percent to 21 percent in 2017 by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97).

During the House Ways and Means Committee hearing, Democrats largely criticized low federal income tax receipts from corporations following the TCJA’s corporate tax rate cut, while Republicans focused on highlighting the resulting economic growth and global competitiveness.

Corporate Tax Revenue
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., opened the hearing by criticizing corporate tax revenues for being at their lowest level in history. "Some large corporations pay zero year after year. It is therefore not surprising that we collect less corporate tax revenue than all but one of the other OECD nations," Neal said during opening statements.

Similarly, Jason Furman, an economic policy professor in the Harvard Kennedy School and Department of Economics at Harvard University, told lawmakers during the hearing that the low levels of corporate tax revenue are a major reason why overall federal revenue is also low. Additionally, Furman told lawmakers that there is no evidence that the TCJA has made a "substantial contribution to investment or longer-term economic growth."

Inversions
However, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum, testified that corporate tax receipts were falling before the TCJA ever took effect. He credited the TCJA’s corporate tax cut for essentially ceasing corporate inversions. A corporate inversion, in very general terms, is a process in which U.S.-based companies relocate operations outside of the country to reduce their tax burden.

"After years of having five to six prominent companies annually depart the United States, inversions have simply stopped," Holtz-Eakin testified. "Multinationals are bringing operations back to the United States, and many acquisitions of U.S. businesses now are made by U.S. firms, rather than foreign buyers," he added.

Further, Holtz-Eakin issued a reminder that "everyone bears the burden" of corporate income taxes. "Corporations are not walled off from the broader economy, and neither are the taxes imposed on corporate income. Taxes on corporations fall on stockholders, employees, and consumers alike."

JCT
The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), Congress’s nonpartisan scorekeeper, detailed in its February 10 report several contributing variables in understanding the corporate income tax equation and its relation to federal revenue. Generally, a corporation’s income tax liability is determined by applying a 21-percent rate to its taxable income.

As the JCT notes in its report, prior to the TCJA, the corporate income tax involved a four-step graduated tax rate schedule, with a top corporate tax rate of 35 percent on taxable income in excess of $10 million. The corporate income tax also included "an alternative minimum tax (AMT) that was payable (in addition to all other tax liabilities) to the extent that it exceeded the corporation’s regular income tax liability." However, the TCJA eliminated the graduated corporate rate structure and repealed the corporate AMT, effective in 2018.

More Hearings Expected
While this particular hearing convened by Democrats was generally seen on Capitol Hill to serve more of a messaging purpose rather than legislative purpose, more TCJA-related hearings are expected this year. "We’re going to be doing a series of hearings on the [GOP] tax bill," Neal told the press after the hearing. "People frequently pay a lot of attention to the spending side, and we are saying that there is also a revenue question here."

Close

The IRS will allow a farmer that is exempt from the uniform capitalization (UNICAP) rules by reason of having average annual gross receipts of $25 million or less to revoke a prior election out of the UNICAP rules made under Code Sec. 263A(d)(3) with respect to pre-productive plant expenditures. The guidance also explains how a farmer may make an election out under Code Sec. 263A(d)(3) in a tax year in which the farmer is no longer exempt from the UNICAP rules as a qualifying small business taxpayer with $25 million or less in average annual gross receipts.

Revocation of the prior election out is beneficial because a farmer that makes the election must depreciate farm property placed in service during any tax year the election is in effect using the MACRS alternative depreciation system (ADS). ADS requires use of the straight-line method over depreciation periods that are generally longer than those that apply under the MACRS general depreciation system (GDS) if the election out is not made ( Code Sec. 263A(e)(2)). If the election out is revoked, a qualifying small business farmer remains exempt from the UNICAP rules under the $25 million gross receipts test but is no longer required to use ADS on existing or newly acquired property by reason of the prior election out.

In addition, a rule that treats all plants produced by the farmer as section 1245 property, and requires ordinary income recapture to the extent of deductions otherwise required to be capitalized, no longer applies to new plantings after revocation of the election out is made ( Code Sec. 263A(e)(1)).

Eligible Farmers
The election out may be revoked by a farmer that:

is exempt from the UNICAP rules by reason of the $25 million average gross receipts test for qualifying small business taxpayers (as described in Code Sec. 448(c) and provided by Code Sec. 263A(i), as added by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), effective for tax years beginning after 2017);
previously made the election out of UNICAP under Code Sec. 263A(d)(3); and
wants to apply the $25 million gross receipts exemption for small business taxpayers in the same tax year that it revokes the Code Sec. 263A(d)(3) election out.

Revocation Procedure
An eligible small business farmer receives IRS consent to revoke a prior election out by continuing not to capitalize costs under the UNICAP rules on its original tax return (including extensions) for the tax year of the revocation of the election out, continuing to treat plantings in prior tax years as section 1245 property, and changing the depreciation method of farm property from ADS to GDS as explained below.

Special rule for 2018 tax year. A small business farmer that already filed a timely 2018 return may revoke the election out in the 2018 tax year by filing an amended 2018 return (an administrative adjustment request in the case of certain partnerships) before filing a 2019 return. Alternatively, Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, may be filed with a timely income tax return for the first, second, or third tax year following the 2018 tax year.

Changing From ADS to GDS
A farmer revoking the election out may cease using ADS to depreciate its existing farming property beginning in the year the election out is revoked, and ADS will not apply to farm property placed in service in the revocation year or thereafter. The switch from ADS to GDS is made using the MACRS change in use rules ( Reg. §1.168(i)-4(d)) and, therefore, the GDS method applies prospectively on the remaining basis of the farm property. The change in use rules, however, allow a farmer to elect to continue to depreciate its existing property using ADS. Property switched from ADS to GDS is not eligible for bonus depreciation. A farmer may make an ADS election for classes of newly acquired property under the usual ADS election rules.

A farmer revoking the election out has adopted an impermissible accounting method if it continues to use ADS in the revocation year and the following tax year (unless the election to continue using ADS was made under the change in use rules). In this case, a farmer must file Form 3115 and compute a section 481 adjustment as if the switch from ADS to GDS had been made in the revocation year. Similarly, a farmer that depreciates newly acquired property using ADS in the revocation year and the following year has adopted an impermissible method that must be corrected by filing Form 3115 unless a valid ADS election was made.

Losing Exemption Under Gross Receipts Test
The guidance allows a small business farmer to make a Code Sec. 263A(d)(3) election out of the UNICAP rules in the first tax year the farmer no longer qualifies for exemption under the $25 million average gross receipts test. The election out is made on the original tax return (including extensions) using the currently prescribed election Code Sec. 263A(d)(3) procedures, and by continuing not to capitalize costs under the UNICAP rules.

The electing farmer must use ADS to depreciate property placed in service in the election out year and subsequent years. Bonus depreciation may not be claimed on this property. An election out is not valid if ADS is not used to depreciate this property. ADS does not apply to property placed in service during tax years prior to the election out year.

Effective Date
The guidance is generally effective on February 21, 2020. Transition guidance is provided for taxpayers that filed a Form 3115 on or before February 21, 2020, to obtain consent to revoke a Code Sec. 263A(d)(3) election.

Rev. Proc. 2019-43, I.R.B. 2019-48, 1107, which lists the automatic accounting method changes, is modified to included certain accounting method changes described in the guidance.

Close

Taxpayers claiming the low-income housing credit should apply the "average income" minimum set aside test by reference to the "very low-income" limits calculated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for purposes of determining eligibility under the HUD Section 8 program. HUD determinations for very low-income housing families are currently used to calculate the low-income housing credit income limits under the alternate "20-50" and "40-60" minimum set-aside tests.

Rev. Rul. 89-24, 1994-2 C.B. 5, as modified and superseded in part by Rev. Rul. 94-57, 1994-2 C.B. 5, is amplified.

Average Income Test
A taxpayer claiming the low-income housing credit under Code Sec. 42 must elect to satisfy one of three minimum-set aside tests:

the "20-50" test, under which at least 20 percent of the residential units in the project must be both rent-restricted and occupied by tenants whose gross income is 50 percent or less of the area median gross income (AMGI);
the "40-60" test, under which at least 40 percent of the residential units in the project must be both rent-restricted and occupied by tenants whose gross income is 60 percent or less of AMGI; or
the "average income" test under Code Sec. 42(g)(1)(C), which was added by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018 ( P.L. 115-141).

The average income test is satisfied if 40 percent or more of the residential units in the project (25 percent or more in the case of a project located in a high cost housing area) are both rent-restricted and occupied by tenants whose income does not exceed the imputed income limitation designated by the taxpayer with respect to the respective unit. The imputed income limitation for any unit must be 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 or 80 percent of AMGI. The average of the designated imputed income limitations may not exceed 60 percent of AMGI.

Application of HUD Calculation
HUD uses three different principal income level calculation categories:

"low-income," which is limited at 80 percent of AMGI;
"very low-income," which is limited at 50 percent of AMGI; and
"extremely low-income," which is limited at the higher of 30 percent of AMGI or the “Federal Poverty Level.”

Under the IRS guidance, HUD’s "very low-income" calculation, as adjusted for family size and consistent with the methods provided in Rev. Rul. 89-24, is used as the basis for determining the full range of percentage-based income limits under the new average-income set-aside test.

Specifically, the income attributable to a family in a unit may not exceed an applicable percentage of the HUD income limit for a very low income family of the same size in accordance with the following schedule for the percentage-based imputed income limit chosen for the unit within the 20 through 80 percent range:

20 percent limit: 40 percent or less of the income limit for a very low-income family of the same size;
30 percent limit: 60 percent or less of the income limit for a very low-income family of the same size;
40 percent limit: 80 percent or less of the income limit for a very low-income family of the same size;
50 percent limit: 100 percent or less of the income limit for a very low-income family of the same size;
60 percent limit: 120 percent or less of the income limit for a very low-income family of the same size;
70 percent limit: 140 percent or less of the income limit for a very low-income family of the same size;
80 percent limit: 160 percent or less of the income limit for a very low-income family of the same size.

A list of income limits released by HUD may be relied upon until 45 days after HUD releases a new list of income limits, or HUD’s effective date for the list expires.

Prospective Application
Special relief is provided to a taxpayer who receives a low-income housing credit allocation prior to February 18, 2020. The taxpayer must have unambiguously indicated in its application that it will elect the average-income set aside test, and also specified a dollar amount as an expected designated imputed income limitation for a unit that is higher than allowed by the new guidance. If the dollar amount is reasonable it may be relied upon for the entire compliance period of the building, and is also used to determine whether the tenant initially meets the income limitation for the unit.

Close

Final regulations increase a vehicle’s maximum value for eligibility to use the fleet-average valuation rule or the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule. The regulations provide transition rules for certain employers. The final regulations are effective on February 5, 2020, the date of publication in the Federal Register.

TCJA Increased Maximum Vehicle Values
Before the Tax Cuts and Job Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), the maximum base fair market value of a vehicle for use of the fleet-average valuation rule was $16,500, as adjusted annually for inflation (in 2017: $21,100 for a passenger automobile, and $23,300 for a truck or van). The pre-TCJA maximum base fair market value of a vehicle for use of the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule was $12,800, as adjusted annually for inflation (in 2017: $15,900 for a passenger automobile, and $17,800 for a truck or van). The TCJA increased these amounts to $50,000, adjusted for inflation.

To implement the changes, the IRS issued Notice 2019-8, I.R.B. 2019-3, 354, to provide interim guidance for 2018 on new procedures for calculating the price inflation adjustments to the maximum vehicle values for use with the fleet-average valuation rule in Reg. §1.61-21(d) and the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule in Reg. §1.61-21(e) using amended Code Sec. 280F(d)(7). In Notice 2019-34. I.R.B. 2019-22, 1257, the IRS provided (among other things) that the inflation-adjusted maximum value of an employer-provided vehicle (including cars, vans, and trucks) first made available to employees for personal use in calendar year 2019 for which the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule or the fleet-average valuation rule may be used is $50,400. This guidance also provided information about the manner in which the Treasury Department and the IRS intended to publish the maximum vehicle value in the future.

In August 2019, a notice of proposed rulemaking was published that was consistent with Notice 2019-8 and Notice 2019-34 and reflected changes made by TCJA to the depreciation limitations in Code Sec. 280F. The final regulations update the fleet-average and vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rules to conform to the changes made by the TCJA.

Trucks and Vans Not Separately Valued
Before the TCJA, inflation adjustments were determined using the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which contained both a new car and a new truck component. Accordingly, separate inflation adjustments were released for cars using the car component of the CPI, and for trucks and vans using the truck component of the CPI.

Under the TCJA, the price inflation amount for automobiles (including trucks and vans) is calculated using both the CPI automobile component and the Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U) automobile component. There is no separate C-CPI-U component for trucks and vans. As a result, the IRS will publish only one maximum value of a vehicle for use with the fleet-average and vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rules.

Transition Rules
Consistent with Notice 2019-34 and the proposed regulations, the final regulations provide several transition rules.

For the Fleet-Average Valuation Rule: If an employer did not qualify to use the fleet-average valuation rule prior to January 1, 2018, because the automobile’s fair market value exceeded the inflation-adjusted maximum value requirement for the year the automobile was first made available to the employee for personal use, the employer may adopt the fleet-average valuation rule for 2018 or 2019, provided the fair market value of the automobile does not exceed $50,000 on January 1, 2018, or $50,400 on January 1, 2019.

For the Vehicle Cents-Per-Mile Valuation Rule: An employer that did not qualify to adopt the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule for a vehicle first made available to an employee for personal use before calendar year 2018, may first adopt the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule for the 2018 or 2019 tax year for the vehicle if:

the employer did not qualify to adopt the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule because the vehicle’s fair market value exceeded the inflation-adjusted limitation for the year the vehicle was first used by the employee for personal use; and
the vehicle’s fair market value does not exceed $50,000 on January 1, 2018, or $50,400 on January 1, 2019.

Similarly, if the commuting valuation rule ( Reg. §1.61-21(f)) was utilized when the vehicle was first used by an employee for personal use, the employer may adopt the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule for the 2018 or 2019 tax year if:

the employer did not qualify to switch to the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule on the first day on which the commuting valuation rule was not used because the vehicle’s fair market value exceeded the inflation-adjusted limitation for the year the commuting valuation rule was first not used; and
the fair market value of the vehicle does not exceed $50,000 on January 1, 2018, or $50,400 on January 1, 2019.

An employer that adopts the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule must continue to use the rule for all subsequent years in which the vehicle qualifies for use of the rule. However, the employer may use the commuting valuation rule for the vehicle for any year during which use of the vehicle qualifies for the commuting valuation rule.

Close

The IRS has provided guidance on qualifying for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). The EITC is a refundable tax credit that is intended to be a financial boost for families with low to moderate incomes.

Due to changes in marital, parental or financial status, millions of workers may qualify for EITC for the first time this year. The IRS urges individuals who (1) work for someone else or have their own businesses or farm, and (2) earned $55,952 or less in 2019, to see if they qualify by using the "EITC Assistant" on the IRS’s website ( https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/individuals/earned-income-tax-credit/use-the-eitc-assistant).

Taxpayers must file a Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, and attach a completed Schedule EIC, Earned Income Credit Qualifying Child Information, to the tax return for a qualifying child, in order to claim EITC. A taxpayer must have a valid Social Security number for themselves, their spouses if they are filing a joint return, and each qualifying child before they file their return.

The IRS expects most EITC-related refunds to be available in taxpayers’ bank accounts or on debit cards by the first week of March, if they choose direct deposit and there are no other issues with their tax return.

Eligibility for EITC
In order to qualify, the worker must have earned income an adjusted gross income with certain limits and meet certain basic rules. The worker also must meet the rules for those without a qualifying child, or must have a child who meets all the qualifying child rules. Only one person can use a particular child to claim the EITC, if that child meets the rules to be a qualifying child for more than one person. Under a special rule, those who receive combat pay may choose to count it as taxable income for the purposes of EITC; this may or may not increase the amount of EITC.

Credit Limits for 2019
For tax year 2019, those who qualify for EITC can get a credit up to:

$529 with no qualifying children,
$3,526 with one qualifying child,
$5,828 with two qualifying children, and
$6,557 with three or more qualifying children.

Free Tax Help
Since EITC is complex and many special rules apply, the IRS encourages workers to do their taxes using the IRS Free File program, by choosing a trusted tax professional, or at a local free tax preparation site. The IRS also reminds taxpayers that they are always be responsible for the accuracy of their own tax return, even if someone else may have prepared it, because filing a tax return with an error on the EITC claim could have lasting impacts.

Close

The IRS has proposed regulations with guidance for employers on withholding federal income tax from employee’s wages.

The IRS has proposed regulations with guidance for employers on withholding federal income tax from employee’s wages. The proposed regulations:

implement recent changes made to Code Secs. 3401 and 3402 by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97); and
reflect the redesigned 2020 Form W-4, Employee’s Withholding Certificate, and the related wage withholding tables and computational procedures published in IRS Pub. 15-T, Federal Income Tax Withholding Methods.

TCJA Changes
The TCJA made many Code amendments affecting income tax withholding on wages. Among other things, the TCJA:

repealed the rule that, for purposes collecting income tax at source on wages, the "number of withholding exemptions claimed" meant the number of withholding exemptions claimed in a withholding exemption certificate in effect, except that if no such certificate was in effect, the number of withholding exemptions claimed was considered zero;
permanently modified the wage withholding rules and replaced "withholding exemptions" with a "withholding allowance" prorated to the payroll period, to reflect the reductions in the personal exemption amount to zero due to the temporarily repeal of the personal and dependency exemption deduction for tax years 2018–2025;
changed the list of factors on which the withholding allowance is based, and entitled an employee to take into account the number of individuals for which the employee expects to take an income tax credit for other dependents, instead of the number of individuals for whom the employee reasonably expects to claim an personal and dependency exemption deduction;
changed an employee’s entitlement to take into account the standard deduction from an amount generally equal to one withholding exemption to the standard deduction allowable to the employee (one-half of the standard deduction for a married employee whose spouse is an employee receiving wages subject to withholding);
added a provision that the employee’s withholding allowance also takes into account whether the employee has withholding allowance certificates in effect for more than one employer;
added the Code Sec. 199A qualified business income deduction to the list of deductions that an employee may take into account in determining the additional withholding allowance that the employee is entitled to claim on Form W-4;
struck references to payments made under certain divorce or separation instruments; and
changed the rules for withholding from periodic payments under Code Sec. 3405(a) when no withholding allowance certificate has been furnished.

IRS Guidance
After the TCJA was enacted, the IRS issued guidance for 2018 and 2019 to implement the changes (e.g., Notice 2018-14, I.R.B. 2018-7, 353; Notice 2018-92, I.R.B. 2018-51, 1038; Notice 2020-3, I.R.B. 2020-3, I.R.B. 2020–3, 330). The IRS also released a draft 2019 Form W-4 and instructions, which made significant changes intended to improve the accuracy of income tax withholding and to make the withholding system more transparent for employees. In response to comments received, Treasury and the IRS postponed implementing the redesigned form until 2020. The final redesigned 2020 Form W-4 was released on December 4, 2019, and was then rereleased on December 31, 2019, to reflect the amendment to the medical expense deduction threshold for 2020 made by the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 ( P.L. 116-94).

In 2019, the IRS also released drafts of IRS Pub. 15-T, which provided percentage method tables, wage bracket withholding tables, and other computational procedures for employers to use to compute withholding for the 2020 calendar year. IRS Pub. 15-T was finalized and released on December 24, 2019. Withholding tables previously published in IRS Pub. 15, (Circular E), Employer’s Tax Guide, IRS Pub. 15-A, Employer’s Supplemental Tax Guide, and IRS Pub. 51, Agricultural Employer’s Tax Guide, are now published in IRS Pub. 15-T. The IRS also discontinued publishing several other withholding tables in 2020.

Proposed Regulations
The proposed regulations incorporate the TCJA changes to Code Secs. 3401 and 3402, and provide flexible and administrable rules for wage withholding that work with both the 2020 Form W-4 and the related tables and computational procedures described in IRS Pub. 15-T, as well as Forms W-4 and related tables and computational procedures provided in 2019 and earlier years. The proposed regulations are generally compatible with the income tax withholding system in effect for 2019, as well as the system in effect for 2020, and may be relied on by employers for withholding until final regulations are published.

W-4 Issues
An employee is not required to furnish a new Form W-4 solely because of the form’s redesign, regardless of when the employee’s Form W-4 currently in effect was furnished. Similarly, an employer must generally continue to compute the amount of tax to be withheld from an employee’s wages based on a valid Form W-4 furnished by the employee regardless of when the employee furnished the Form W-4.

The 2020 IRS Pub. 15-T provides guidance on how employers will withhold income tax using Forms W-4 furnished and in effect on or before December 31, 2019. An employer can ask all employees who were first paid wages before 2020 to furnish a 2020 Form W-4, but if it does, the employer should explain that:

employees are not required to furnish a new Form W-4; and
if the employee does not furnish a 2020 Form W-4, the tax to be withheld from the employee’s wages will continue to be based on the last valid Form W-4 previously furnished.

Similar to the current regulations, the proposed regulations generally provide that Forms W-4 that took effect under prior law generally remain in effect until another Form W-4 is furnished. There are special rules regarding when a Form W-4 furnished by an employee subject to a "lock-in letter" stops being effective.

Periodic Payments
The proposed regulations do not address withholding under Code Sec. 3405(a) on periodic payments from pensions, annuities, or certain other deferred income. Instead, Notice 2020-3 describes the withholding rules for the 2020 calendar year.

Proposed Applicability Date
The proposed regulations are generally proposed to apply on the date that a Treasury Decision adopting them as final regulations is published in the Federal Register. Taxpayers may rely on the rules set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking until that date. However, Proposed Reg. §31.3402(f)(2)-1(g) is proposed to apply on February 13, 2020 (i.e., the date the notice of proposed rulemaking was published in the Federal Register), Proposed Reg. §31.3402(f)(5)-1(a)(3) is proposed to apply on March 16, 2020 (i.e., 30 days after the date the notice of proposed rulemaking was published in the Federal Register), and a proposed removal of Reg. §31.3402(h)(4)-1(b) relating to the combined income tax withholding and employee FICA tax withholding tables is proposed to apply on and after January 1, 2020. Except for the removal of Reg. §31.3402(h)(4)-1(b), taxpayers may choose to apply the rules on or after January 1, 2020.

Comments and Requests for Hearing
Before the proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations, the IRS will consider any electronic and written comments that are submitted timely to the IRS. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects of the proposed rules. All comments will be available at http://www.regulations.gov or upon request. A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any person that timely submits written comments. If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of its date, time, and place will be published in the Federal Register.

Electronic submissions are made via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-132741-17) by following the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted to the Federal eRulemaking portal, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The Treasury Department and the IRS will publish for public availability any comment received to their public docket, whether submitted electronically or in hard copy. Send hard copy submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-132741-17), room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044.

All comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by April 13, 2020.

Close

As a result of recent changes in the law, many brokerage customers will begin seeing something new when they gaze upon their 1099-B forms early next year. In the past, of course, brokers were required to report to their clients, and the IRS, those amounts reflecting the gross proceeds of any securities sales taking place during the preceding calendar year.

In keeping with a broader move toward greater information reporting requirements, however, new tax legislation now makes it incumbent upon brokers to provide their clients, and the IRS, with their adjusted basis in the lots of securities they purchase after certain dates, as well. While an onerous new requirement for the brokerage houses, this development ought to simplify the lives of many ordinary taxpayers by relieving them of the often difficult matter of calculating their stock bases.

When calculating gain, or loss, on the sale of stock, all taxpayers must employ a very simple formula. By the terms of this calculus, gain equals amount realized (how much was received in the sale) less adjusted basis (generally, how much was paid to acquire the securities plus commissions). By requiring brokers to provide their clients with both variables in the formula, Congress has lifted a heavy load from the shoulders of many.

FIFO

The new requirements also specify that, if a customer sells some amount of shares less than her entire holding in a given stock, the broker must report the customer's adjusted basis using the "first in, first out" method, unless the broker receives instructions from the customer directing otherwise. The difference in tax consequences can be significant.

Example. On January 16, 2011, Laura buys 100 shares of Big Co. common stock for $100 a share. After the purchase, Big Co. stock goes on a tear, quickly rising in price to $200 a share, on April 11, 2011. Believing the best is still ahead for Big Co., Laura buys another 100 shares of Big Co. common on that date, at that price. However, rather than continuing its meteoric rise, the price of Big Co. stock rapidly plummets to $150, on May 8, 2011. At this point, Laura, tired of seeing her money evaporate, sells 100 of her Big Co. shares.

Since Laura paid $100 a share for the first lot of Big Co. stock that she purchased (first in), her basis in those shares is $100 per share (plus any brokerage commissions). Her basis in the second lot, however, is $200 per share (plus any commissions). Unless Laura directs her broker to use an alternate method, the broker will use the first in stock basis of $100 per share in its reporting of this first out sale. Laura, accordingly, will be required to report a short-term capital gain of $50 per share (less brokerage commissions). Had she instructed her broker to use the "last in, first out" method, she would, instead, see a short-term capital loss of $50 per share (plus commissions).

Dividend Reinvestment Plans

As their name would suggest, dividend reinvestment plans (DRPs) allow investors the opportunity to reinvest all, or a portion, of any dividends received back into additional shares, or fractions of shares, of the paying corporation. While offering investors many advantages, one historical drawback to DRPs has been their tendency to obligate participants to keep track of their cost bases for many small purchases of stock, and maintain records of these purchases, sometimes over the course of many years. Going forward, however taxpayers will be able to average the basis of stock held in a DRP acquired on or after January 1, 2011.

Applicability

The types of securities covered by the legislation include virtually every conceivable financial instrument subject to a basis calculation, including stock in a corporation, which become "covered" securities when acquired after a certain date. In the case of corporate stock, for example, the applicability date is January 1, 2011, unless the stock is in a mutual fund or is acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment program (DRP), in which case the applicable date is January 1, 2012. The applicable date for all other securities is January 1, 2013.

Short Sales

In the past, brokers reported the gross proceeds of short sales in the year in which the short position was opened. The amendments, however, require that brokers report short sales for the year in which the short sale is closed.

The Complex World of Stock Basis

There are, quite literally, as many ways to calculate one's basis in stock as there are ways to acquire that stock. Many of these calculations can be nuanced and very complex. For any questions concerning the new broker-reporting requirements, or stock basis, in general, please contact our office.

Close

Information reporting continues to expand as Congress seeks to close the tax gap: the estimated $350 billion difference between what taxpayers owe and what they pay. Despite the recent rollback of expanded information reporting for business payments and rental property expense payments, the trend is for more - not less - information reporting of various transactions to the IRS.

Transactions

A large number of transactions are required to be reported to the IRS on an information return. The most common transaction is the payment of wages to employees. Every year, tens of millions of Forms W-2 are issued to employees. A copy of every Form W-2 is also provided to the IRS. Besides wages, information reporting touches many other transactions. For example, certain agricultural payments are reported on Form 1099-G, certain dividends are reported on Form 1099-DIV, certain IRA distributions are reported on Form 1099-R, certain gambling winnings are reported on Form W-2G, and so on. The IRS receives more than two billion information returns every year.

Valuable to IRS

Information reporting is valuable to the IRS because the agency can match the information reported by the employer, seller or other taxpayer with the information reported by the employee, purchaser or other taxpayer. When information does not match, this raises a red flag at the IRS. Let's look at an example:

Silvio borrowed funds to pay for college. Silvio's lender agreed to forgive a percentage of the debt if Silvio agreed to direct debit of his monthly repayments. This forgiveness of debt was reported by the lender to Silvio and the IRS. However, when Silvio filed his federal income tax return, he forgot, in good faith, to report the forgiveness of debt. The IRS was aware of the transaction because the lender filed an information return with the IRS.

Expansion

In recent years, Congress has enacted new information reporting requirements. Among the new requirements are ones for reporting the cost of employer-provided health insurance to employees, broker reporting of certain stock transactions and payment card reporting (all discussed below).

Employer-provided health insurance. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requires employers to advise employees of the cost of employer-provided health insurance. This information will be provided to employees on Form W-2.

This reporting requirement is optional for all employers in 2011, the IRS has explained. There is additional relief for small employers. Employers filing fewer than 250 W-2 forms with the IRS are not required to report this information for 2011and 2012. The IRS may extend this relief beyond 2012. Our office will keep you posted of developments.

Reporting of employer-provided health insurance is for informational purposes only, the IRS has explained. It is intended to show employees the value of their health care benefits so they can be more informed consumers.

Broker reporting. Reporting is required for most stock purchased in 2011 and all stock purchased in 2012 and later years, the IRS has explained. The IRS has expanded Form 1099-B to include the cost or other basis of stock and mutual fund shares sold or exchanged during the year. Stock brokers and mutual fund companies will use this form to make these expanded year-end reports. The expanded form will also be used to report whether gain or loss realized on these transactions is long-term (held more than one year) or short-term (held one year or less), a key factor affecting the tax treatment of gain or loss.

Payment card reporting. Various payment card transactions after 2010 must be reported to the IRS. This reporting does not affect individuals using a credit or debit card to make a purchase, the IRS has explained. Reporting will be made by the payment settlement entities, such as banks. Payment settlement entities are required to report payments made to merchants for goods and services in settlement of payment card and third-party payment network transactions.

Roll back

In 2010, Congress expanded information reporting but this time there was a backlash. The PPACA required businesses and certain other taxpayers to file an information return when they make annual purchases aggregating $600 or more to a single vendor (other than a tax-exempt vendor) for payments made after December 31, 2011. The PPACA also repealed the long-standing reporting exception for payments made to corporations. The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 required information reporting by landlords of certain rental property expense payments of $600 or more to a service provider made after December 31, 2011.

Many businesses, especially small businesses, warned that compliance would be costly. After several failed attempts, Congress passed legislation in April 2011 (H.R. 4, the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection Act) to repeal both expanded business information reporting and rental property expense reporting.

The future

In April 2011, IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman described his vision for tax collection in the future in a speech in Washington, D.C. Information reporting is at the center of Shulman's vision.

Shulman explained that the IRS would get all information returns from third parties before taxpayers filed their returns. Taxpayers or their professional return preparers would then access that information, online, and download it into their returns. Taxpayers would then add any self-reported and supplemental information to their returns, and file their returns with the IRS. The IRS would embed this core third-party information into its pre-screening filters, and would immediately reject any return that did not match up with its records.

Shulman acknowledged that this system would take time and resources to develop. But the trend is in favor of more, not less, information reporting.

Close

Taxpayers that place new business assets other than real property in service through 2012 may claim a "bonus" depreciation deduction. Although the bonus depreciation deduction is generally equal to 50 percent of the cost of qualified property, the rate has been increased by recent legislation to 100 percent for new business assets acquired after September 8, 2010 and placed in service before January 1, 2012. Thus, the entire cost of such 100 percent rate property is deducted in a single tax year rather than over the three- to 20-year depreciation period that is normally assigned to the property based on its type or the business activity in which it is used.

Every business should consider taking advantage of 100 percent bonus depreciation while it is available this year. Ironically, the benefits of 100 percent bonus depreciation are so favorable that some of the regular tax rules standing guard under normal circumstances to prevent abuses are being unintentionally triggered. The IRS has now come to the rescue with a few clarifications, elections and workarounds, in the form of Rev. Proc. 2011-26.

The most important clarifications/elections provide:

--A taxpayer is deemed to acquire qualified property when it pays or incurs the cost of the property.

--Bonus depreciation may be claimed at the 100 percent rate even though a pre-September 9, 2010 binding acquisition contract was in effect provided the contract was not in effect before January 1, 2008.

--Qualified property that a taxpayer manufactures, constructs, or produces is considered acquired by the taxpayer when the taxpayer begins constructing, manufacturing, or producing that property.

--A taxpayer may elect to claim 100 percent bonus depreciation on a component of a larger property if the component is acquired after September 8, 2010 even though manufacture, construction, or production of the larger property began before September 9, 2010.

--A taxpayer may elect the 50 percent rate in place of the 100 percent rate but only in a tax year that includes September 9, 2010.

Election Procedures for 2009/2010 FY Taxpayers

Special procedures that mainly affect fiscal-year (FY) 2009-2010 taxpayers who filed returns prior to the reinstatement of bonus depreciation for the 2010 calendar year explain how to claim or not claim the bonus deduction on property placed in service in 2010.

"Safe Harbor" Enhances Bonus Depreciation for Cars

The guidance also provides an important benefit to taxpayers who purchase a new automobile in 2010 or 2011 that is eligible for the 100 percent bonus rate but which is subject to annual depreciation caps because the vehicle has a gross vehicle weight rating of 6000 pounds or less. The benefit comes in the form of a "safe harbor method of accounting," which allows a taxpayer to claim depreciation deductions in each year of the vehicle's depreciation period.

If this safe harbor method of accounting is not adopted, a taxpayer may only claim a depreciation deduction in the tax year that the vehicle is purchased and that deduction is limited to the amount of the first-year depreciation cap ($11,060 for cars and $11,160 for trucks and vans placed in service in 2010).

If the safe harbor method is adopted, a taxpayer may claim the amount of the first-year depreciation cap in the year the vehicle is purchased plus additional amounts in each of the next five tax years of the vehicle's regular depreciation period.

In most cases, the amount of depreciation allowed in each year of a vehicle's recovery period under the safe harbor method is the same amount that could have been claimed if the 50 percent bonus rate applied.

Close

As the 2015 tax filing season comes to an end, now is a good time to begin thinking about next year's returns. While it may seem early to be preparing for 2016, taking some time now to review your recordkeeping will pay off when it comes time to file next year.

Taxpayers are required to keep accurate, permanent books and records so as to be able to determine the various types of income, gains, losses, costs, expenses and other amounts that affect their income tax liability for the year. The IRS generally does not require taxpayers to keep records in a particular way, and recordkeeping does not have to be complicated. However, there are some specific recordkeeping requirements that taxpayers should keep in mind throughout the year.

Business Expense Deductions

A business can choose any recordkeeping system suited to their business that clearly shows income and expenses. The type of business generally affects the type of records a business needs to keep for federal tax purposes. Purchases, sales, payroll, and other transactions that incur in a business generate supporting documents. Supporting documents include sales slips, paid bills, invoices, receipts, deposit slips, and canceled checks. Supporting documents for business expenses should show the amount paid and that the amount was for a business expense. Documents for expenses include canceled checks; cash register tapes; account statements; credit card sales slips; invoices; and petty cash slips for small cash payments.

The Cohan rule. A taxpayer generally has the burden of proving that he is entitled to deduct an amount as a business expense or for any other reason. However, a taxpayer whose records or other proof is not adequate to substantiate a claimed deduction may be allowed to deduct an estimated amount under the so-called Cohan rule. Under this rule, if a taxpayer has no records to provide the amount of a business expense deduction, but a court is satisfied that the taxpayer actually incurred some expenses, the court may make an allowance based on an estimate, if there is some rational basis for doing so.

However, there are special recordkeeping requirements for travel, transportation, entertainment, gifts and listed property, which includes passenger automobiles, entertainment, recreational and amusement property, computers and peripheral equipment, and any other property specified by regulation. The Cohan rule does not apply to those expenses. For those items, taxpayers must substantiate each element of an expenditure or use of property by adequate records or by sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayer's own statement.

Individuals

Record keeping is not just for businesses. The IRS recommends that individuals keep the following records:
Copies of Tax Returns. Old tax returns are useful in preparing current returns and are necessary when filing an amended return.
Adoption Credit and Adoption Exclusion. Taxpayers should maintain records to support any adoption credit or adoption assistance program exclusion.
Employee Expenses. Travel, entertainment and gift expenses must be substantiated through appropriate proof. Receipts should be retained and a log may be kept for items for which there is no receipt. Similarly, written records should be maintained for business mileage driven, business purpose of the trip and car expenses for business use of a car.
Business Use of Home. Records must show the part of the taxpayer's home used for business and that such use is exclusive. Records are also needed to show the depreciation and expenses for the business part of the home.
Capital Gains and Losses. Records must be kept showing the cost of acquiring a capital asset, when the asset was acquired, how the asset was used, and, if sold, the date of sale, the selling price and the expenses of the sale.
Basis of Property. Homeowners must keep records of the purchase price, any purchase expenses, the cost of home improvements and any basis adjustments, such as depreciation and deductible casualty losses.
Basis of Property Received as a Gift. A donee must have a record of the donor's adjusted basis in the property and the property's fair market value when it is given as a gift. The donee must also have a record of any gift tax the donor paid.
Service Performed for Charitable Organizations. The taxpayer should keep records of out-of-pocket expenses in performing work for charitable organizations to claim a deduction for such expenses.
Pay Statements. Taxpayers with deductible expenses withheld from their paychecks should keep their pay statements for a record of the expenses.
Divorce Decree. Taxpayers deducting alimony payments should keep canceled checks or financial account statements and a copy of the written separation agreement or the divorce, separate maintenance or support decree.

Don't forget receipts. In addition, the IRS recommends that the following receipts be kept:

Proof of medical and dental expenses;
Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, and canceled checks showing the amount of estimated tax payments;
Statements, notes, canceled checks and, if applicable, Form 1098, Mortgage Interest Statement, showing interest paid on a mortgage;
Canceled checks or receipts showing charitable contributions, and for contributions of $250 or more, an acknowledgment of the contribution from the charity or a pay stub or other acknowledgment from the employer if the contribution was made by deducting $250 or more from a single paycheck;
Receipts, canceled checks and other documentary evidence that evidence miscellaneous itemized deductions; and
Pay statements that show the amount of union dues paid.

Electronic Records/Electronic Storage Systems

Records maintained in an electronic storage system, if compliant with IRS specifications, constitute records as required by the Code. These rules apply to taxpayers that maintain books and records by using an electronic storage system that either images their hard-copy books and records or transfers their computerized books and records to an electronic storage media, such as an optical disk.

The electronic storage rules apply to all matters under the jurisdiction of the IRS including, but not limited to, income, excise, employment and estate and gift taxes, as well as employee plans and exempt organizations. A taxpayer's use of a third party, such as a service bureau or time-sharing service, to provide an electronic storage system for its books and records does not relieve the taxpayer of the responsibilities described in these rules. Unless otherwise provided under IRS rules and regulations, all the requirements that apply to hard-copy books and records apply as well to books and records that are stored electronically under these rules.

Close

A limited liability company (LLC) is a business entity created under state law. Every state and the District of Columbia have LLC statutes that govern the formation and operation of LLCs.

The main advantage of an LLC is that in general its members are not personally liable for the debts of the business. Members of LLCs enjoy similar protections from personal liability for business obligations as shareholders in a corporation or limited partners in a limited partnership. Unlike the limited partnership form, which requires that there must be at least one general partner who is personally liable for all the debts of the business, no such requirement exists in an LLC.

A second significant advantage is the flexibility of an LLC to choose its federal tax treatment. Under IRS's "check-the-box rules, an LLC can be taxed as a partnership, C corporation or S corporation for federal income tax purposes. A single-member LLC may elect to be disregarded for federal income tax purposes or taxed as an association (corporation).

LLCs are typically used for entrepreneurial enterprises with small numbers of active participants, family and other closely held businesses, real estate investments, joint ventures, and investment partnerships. However, almost any business that is not contemplating an initial public offering (IPO) in the near future might consider using an LLC as its entity of choice.

Deciding to convert an LLC to a corporation later generally has no federal tax consequences. This is rarely the case when converting a corporation to an LLC. Therefore, when in doubt between forming an LLC or a corporation at the time a business in starting up, it is often wise to opt to form an LLC. As always, exceptions apply. Another alternative from the tax side of planning is electing "S Corporation" tax status under the Internal Revenue Code.

Close

A business with a significant amount of receivables should evaluate whether some of them may be written off as business bad debts. A business taxpayer may deduct business bad debts if the receivable becomes partially or completely worthless during the tax year.

In general, most business taxpayers must use the specific charge-off method to account for bad debts. The deduction in any case is limited to the taxpayer's adjusted basis in the receivable.

The deduction allowed for bad debts is an ordinary deduction, which can serve to offset regular business income dollar for dollar. If the taxpayer holds a security, which is a capital asset, and the security becomes worthless during the tax year, the tax law only allows a deduction for a capital loss. However, notes receivable obtained in the ordinary course of business are not capital assets. Therefore, if such notes become partially or completely worthless during the tax year, the taxpayer may claim an ordinary deduction for bad debts.

For a taxpayer to sustain a bad debt deduction, the debt must be bona fide. The IRS looks carefully at a bad debt of a family member.

To be entitled to a business debt write off, the taxpayer must also make a reasonable attempt to collect the debt. However, in a nod to reality, the IRS does not request the taxpayer to turn the debt over to a collection agency or file a lawsuit in an attempt to collect the debt if doing so has little probability of success.

Deadlines for claiming a write off for any past business bad debt must be watched. Taxpayers have until the later of (1) seven years from the date they timely filed their tax return or (2) two years from the time they paid the tax, to claim a refund for a deduction for a wholly worthless debt not deducted on the original return.

Close

Estimated tax is used to pay tax on income that is not subject to withholding or if not enough tax is being withheld from a person's salary, pension or other income. Income not subject to withholding can include dividends, capital gains, prizes, awards, interest, self-employment income, and alimony, among other income items. Generally, individuals who do not pay at least 90 percent of their tax through withholding must estimate their income tax liability and make equal quarterly payments of the "required annual payment" liability during the year.

Basic rules

The "basic" rules governing estimated tax payments are not always synonymous with "straightforward" rules. The following addresses some basic rules regarding estimated tax payments by corporations and individuals:

Corporations. For calendar-year corporations, estimated tax installments are due on April 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15. If any due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, the payment is due on the first following business day. To avoid a penalty, each installment must equal at least 25 percent of the lesser of:

100 percent of the tax shown on the corporation's current year's tax return (or of the actual tax, if no return is filed); or
100 percent of the tax shown on the corporation's return for the preceding tax year, provided a positive tax liability was shown and the preceding tax year consisted of 12 months.

A lower installment amount may be paid if it is shown that use of an annualized income method, or for corporations with seasonal incomes, an adjusted seasonal method, would result in a lower required installment.

Individuals. For individuals (including sole proprietors, partners, self-employeds, and/or S corporation shareholders who expect to owe tax of more than $1,000), quarterly estimated tax payments are due on April 15, June 15, September 15, and January 15. Individuals who do not pay at least 90 percent of their tax through withholding generally are required to estimate their income tax liability and make equal quarterly payments of the "required annual payment" liability during the year. The required annual payment is generally the lesser of:

90 percent of the tax ultimately shown on your return for the 2015 tax year, or 90 percent of the tax due for the year if no return is filed;
100 percent of the tax shown on your return for the preceding (2014) tax year if that year was not for a short period of less than 12 months; or
The annualized income installment.

For higher-income taxpayers whose adjusted gross income (AGI) shown on your 2014 tax return exceeds $150,000 (or $75,000 for a married individual filing separately in 2015), the required annual payment is the lesser of 90 percent of the tax for the current year, or 110 percent of the tax shown on the return for the preceding tax year.

Adjusting estimated tax payments

If you expect an uneven income stream for 2015, your required estimated tax payments may not necessarily be the same for each remaining period, requiring adjustment. The need for, and the extent of, adjustments to your estimated tax payments should be assessed at the end of each installment payment period.

For example, a change in your or your business's income, deductions, credits, and exemptions may make it necessary to refigure estimated tax payments for the remainder of the year. Likewise for individuals, changes in your exemptions, deductions, and credits may require a change in estimated tax payments. To avoid either a penalty from the IRS or overpaying the IRS interest-free, you may want to increase or decrease the amount of your remaining estimated tax payments.

Refiguring tax payments due

There are some general steps you can take to reconfigure your estimated tax payments. To change your estimated tax payments, refigure your total estimated tax payments due. Then, figure the payment due for each remaining payment period. However, be careful: if an estimated tax payment for a previous period is less than one-fourth of your amended estimated tax, you may be subject to a penalty when you file your return.

If you would like further information about changing your estimated tax payments, please contact our office.

Close

The IRS has issued the limitations on depreciation deductions for owners of passenger automobiles, trucks and vans first "placed in service" (i.e. used) during the 2011 calendar year. The IRS also provided revised tables of depreciation limits for vehicles first placed in service (or first leased by a taxpayer) during 2010 and to which bonus depreciation applies.

Note. Bonus depreciation may not be applicable because, among other reasons, you purchased the vehicle used. You may elect out of bonus depreciation or elect to increase the alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit limit under Code Sec. 53 instead of claiming bonus depreciation.

Bonus depreciation backdrop

The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 extended 50 percent bonus depreciation through the end of 2010. The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 extended bonus depreciation for two years (through the end of 2012) and increased the bonus depreciation allowance rate from 50 percent to 100 percent for qualified property acquired after September 8, 2010 and before January 1, 2012, and placed in service before January 1, 2012.

Nevertheless, the additional first-year bonus depreciation amount applicable to vehicles is limited to $8,000, whether other assets in the same depreciation class are entitled to 50 percent or 100 percent bonus depreciation. Sport Utility Vehicles (SUVs) and pickup trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) in excess of 6,000 pounds continue to be exempt from the luxury vehicle depreciation caps (under Code Sec. 280F).

Passenger automobiles

The maximum depreciation limits under Code Sec. 280F for passenger automobiles first placed into service during the 2011 calendar year are:

- $11,060 for the first tax year ($3,060 if bonus depreciation is not taken);
- $4,900 for the second tax year;
- $2,950 for the third tax year; and
- $1,775 for each tax year thereafter.

Trucks and vans

The maximum depreciation limits under Code Sec. 280F for trucks and vans first placed into service during the 2011 calendar year are:

- $11,260 for the first tax year ($3,260 if bonus depreciation is not taken);
- $5,200 for the second tax year;
- $3,150 for the third tax year; and
- $1,875 for each tax year thereafter.

Leases

Lease payments for vehicles used for business or investment purposes are deductible in proportion to the vehicle's business use. Lessees, however, must include a certain amount in income during the year the vehicle is leased to partially offset the amount by which lease payments exceed the luxury auto limits.

Close

In-plan Roth IRA rollovers are a relatively new creation, and as a result many individuals are not aware of the rules. The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 made it possible for participants in 401(k) plans and 403(b) plans to roll over eligible distributions made after September 27, 2010 from such accounts, or other non-Roth accounts, into a designated Roth IRA in the same plan. Beginning in 2011, this option became available to 457(b) governmental plans as well. These "in-plan" rollovers and the rules for making them, which may be tricky, are discussed below.

Designated Roth account

401(k) plans and 403(b) plans that have designated Roth accounts may offer in-plan Roth rollovers for eligible rollover distributions. Beginning in 2011, the option became available to 457(b) governmental plans, allowing the plan to adopt an amendment to include designated Roth accounts to then offer in-plan Roth rollovers.

In order to make an in-plan Roth IRA rollover from a non-Roth account to the plan, the plan must have a designated Roth account option. Thus, if a 401(k) plan does not have a Roth 401(k) contribution program in place at the time the rollover contribution is made, the rollover generally cannot be made (however, a plan can be amended to allow new in-service distributions from the plan's non-Roth accounts conditioned on the participant rolling over the distribution in an in-plan Roth direct rollover). Not only may plan participants make an in-plan rollover, but a participant's surviving spouse, beneficiaries and alternate payees who are current or former spouses are also eligible.

Eligible amounts

To be eligible for an in-plan rollover, the amount to be rolled over must be eligible for distribution to you under the terms of the plan and must be otherwise eligible for rollover (i.e. an eligible rollover distribution). Generally, any vested amount that is held in 401(k) plans or 403(b) plans (or 457(b) plans) is eligible for an in-plan Roth rollover. Moreover, the distribution must satisfy the general distribution requirements that otherwise apply.

Direct rollover or 60-day rollover

An in-plan Roth rollover may be accomplished two ways: either through a direct rollover (wherein the plan's administrator directly transfers funds from the non-Roth account to the participant's designated Roth account) or through a 60-day rollover. With an in-plan Roth direct rollover, the plan trustee transfers an eligible rollover distribution from a participant's non-Roth account to the participant's designated Roth account in the same plan. With an-plan Roth 60-day rollover, the participant deposits an eligible rollover distribution within 60 days of receiving it from a non-Roth account into a designated Roth account in the same plan.

If you opt for the 60-day rollover option, the amounts rolled over are subject to 20 percent mandatory withholding.

Taxation

Taxpayers generally include the taxable amount (fair market value minus your basis in the distribution) of an in-plan Roth rollover in gross income for the tax year in which the rollover is received.

If you have questions about making an in-plan Roth IRA rollover, please contact our office.

Close

Often, timing is everything or so the adage goes. From medicine to sports and cooking, timing can make all the difference in the outcome. What about with taxes? What are your chances of being audited? Does timing play a factor in raising or decreasing your risk of being audited by the IRS? For example, does the time when you file your income tax return affect the IRS's decision to audit you? Some individuals think filing early will decrease their risk of an audit, while others file at the very-last minute, believing this will reduce their chance of being audited. And some taxpayers don't think timing matters at all.

What your return says is key

If it's not the time of filing, what really increases your audit potential? The information on your return, your income bracket and profession--not when you file--are the most significant factors that increase your chances of being audited. The higher your income the more attractive your return becomes to the IRS. And if you're self-employed and/or work in a profession that generates mostly cash income, you are also more likely to draw IRS attention.

Further, you may pique the IRS's interest and trigger an audit if:

You claim a large amount of itemized deductions or an unusually large amount of deductions or losses in relation to your income;
You have questionable business deductions;
You are a higher-income taxpayer;
You claim tax shelter investment losses;
Information on your return doesn't match up with information on your 1099 or W-2 forms received from your employer or investment house;
You have a history of being audited;
You are a partner or shareholder of a corporation that is being audited;
You are self-employed or you are a business or profession currently on the IRS's "hit list" for being targeted for audit, such as Schedule C (Form 1040) filers);
You are primarily a cash-income earner (i.e. you work in a profession that is traditionally a cash-income business)
You claim the earned income tax credit;
You report rental property losses; or
An informant has contacted the IRS asserting you haven't complied with the tax laws.

DIF score

Most audits are generated by a computer program that creates a DIF score (Discriminate Information Function) for your return. The DIF score is used by the IRS to select returns with the highest likelihood of generating additional taxes, interest and penalties for collection by the IRS. It is computed by comparing certain tax items such as income, expenses and deductions reported on your return with national DIF averages for taxpayers in similar tax brackets.

E-filed returns. There is a perception that e-filed returns have a higher audit risk, but there is no proof to support it. All data on hand-written returns end up in a computer file at the IRS anyway; through a combination of a scanning and a hand input procedure that takes place soon after the return is received by the Service Center. Computer cross-matching of tax return data against information returns (W-2s, 1099s, etc.) takes place no matter when or how you file.

Early or late returns. Some individuals believe that since the pool of filed returns is small at the beginning of the filing season, they have a greater chance of being audited. There is no evidence that filing your tax return early increases your risk of being audited. In fact, if you expect a refund from the IRS you should file early so that you receive your refund sooner. Additionally, there is no evidence of an increased risk of audit if you file late on a valid extension. The statute of limitations on audits is generally three years, measured from the due date of the return (April 18 for individuals this year, but typically April 15) whether filed on that date or earlier, or from the date received by the IRS if filed after April 18.

Amended returns. Since all amended returns are visually inspected, there may be a higher risk of being examined. Therefore, weigh the risk carefully before filing an amended return. Amended returns are usually associated with the original return. The Service Center can decide to accept the claim or, if not, send the claim and the original return to the field for examination.

Close

President Obama unveiled his fiscal year (FY) 2012 federal budget recommendations in February, proposing to increase taxes on higher-income individuals, repeal some business tax preferences, reform international taxation, and make a host of other changes to the nation's tax laws. The president's FY 2012 budget touches almost every taxpayer in what it proposes, and in some cases, what is left out.

Roadmap

Every federal budget proposal is just that: a proposal, or a list of recommendations from the White House to Congress. Ultimately, it is for Congress to decide whether to fund a particular government program and at what level. The same is true for tax cuts and tax increases. The final budget for FY 2012 will be a compromise. Nonetheless, President Obama's FY 2012 budget is a helpful tool to predict in what direction federal tax policy may move.

Individuals

In his FY 2012 budget, President Obama repeats his call for Congress to end the Bush-era tax cuts for higher-income individuals (which the president generally defines as single individuals with incomes over $200,000 and married couples with incomes over $250,000). The top individual income tax rates would increase to 36 percent and 39.6 percent, respectively, after 2012. For 2011 and 2012, the top two individual income tax rates are 33 percent and 35 percent, respectively. The president also proposes to limit the deductions of higher income individuals.

Additionally, the president wants Congress to extend the reduced tax rates on capital gains and dividends, but not for higher-income individuals. Single individuals with incomes above $200,000 and married couples with incomes above $250,000 would pay capital gains and dividend taxes at 20 percent rather than at 15 percent after 2012.

The president's FY 2012 budget, among other things, also proposes:

An AMT patch (higher exemption amounts and other targeted relief) after 2011;
A permanent American Opportunity Tax Credit (enhanced Hope education tax credit) after 2012;
A permanent enhanced earned income credit;
A new exclusion from income for certain higher education student loan forgiveness;
One-time payments of $250 to Social Security beneficiaries, disabled veterans and others with a corresponding tax credit for retirees who do not receive Social Security; and
A temporary extension of certain tax incentives, such as the state and local sales tax deduction and the higher education tuition deduction, for one year.

Some of the proposals in the president's FY 2012 budget impact how individuals interact with the IRS. Many taxpayers complain that when they call the IRS, the wait times to speak to an IRS representative are so long they hang up. The president proposes to increase the IRS's budget to hire more customer service representatives. The president also proposes to allow the IRS to accept debit and credit card payments directly, thereby enabling taxpayers to avoid third party processing fees.

Businesses

The tax incentives for businesses in the president's FY 2012 budget are generally targeted to specific industries. One popular but temporary business tax incentive would be made permanent. President Obama proposes to extend permanently the research tax credit. The president also proposes to permanently abolish capital gains tax on investments in certain small businesses.

Other business proposals include:

Employer tax credits for creating jobs in newly designated Growth Zones;
Additional tax breaks for investments in energy-efficient property;
More funds for grants in lieu of tax credits for specified energy property;
One-year extensions of some temporary business tax incentives, such as the Indian employment credit and environmental remediation expensing;
Modifying Form 1099 business information reporting; and
Extending and reforming Build America Bonds.

The president's FY 2012 budget does not include a cut in the U.S. corporate tax rate. Any reduction in the U.S. corporate tax rate is likely to come outside the budget process. The president has spoken often in recent weeks about reducing the U.S. corporate tax rate but he wants any reduction to be revenue neutral; that is, the cost of cutting the U.S. corporate tax rate must be paid for. President Obama has discussed closing some unspecific tax loopholes.

IRS operations

President Obama proposes a significant increase in funding for the IRS. Most of the money would go to hiring new revenue officers and boosting enforcement activities. The White House predicts that investing $13 billion in the IRS over the next 10 years will generate an additional $56 billion in additional tax revenue over the same time period.

Estate tax

Late last year, the White House and the GOP agreed on a maximum federal estate tax rate of 35 percent with a $5 million exclusion for 2010, 2011 and 2012. In his FY 2012 budget, the president proposes to return the federal estate tax to its 2009 levels after 2012 (a maximum tax rate of 45 percent and a $3.5 million exclusion). President Obama also proposes to limit the duration of the generation skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption and to make other estate-tax related changes.

Revenue raisers

The White House and Congress are both looking at ways to cut the federal budget deficit. Taxes are one way. The president's FY 2012 budget proposes a number of revenue raisers, especially in the area of international taxation and in fossil fuel production.

International taxation. The president's budget proposes to reduce tax incentives for U.S.-based multinational companies. One goal of this strategy is to encourage multinational companies to invest in job creation in the U.S. The president's FY 2012 budget calls for, among other things, to limit earnings stripping by expatriated entities, to limit income shifting through intangible property transfers, and to make more reforms to the foreign tax credit rules. If enacted, all of the proposed international taxation reforms would raise an estimated $129 billion in additional revenue over 10 years.

LIFO. President Obama proposes to repeal the last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory accounting method for federal income tax purposes. Taxpayers that currently use the LIFO method would be required to write up their beginning LIFO inventory to its first-in, first-out (FIFO) value in the first tax year beginning after December 31, 2012. This proposal would raise an estimated $52.8 billion over 10 years.

Fossil fuel tax preferences. The Tax Code includes a number of tax incentives for oil, gas and coal producers. President Obama proposes to repeal nearly all of these tax breaks for oil, gas and coal companies. These proposals would raise an estimated $46.1 billion over 10 years.

Financial institutions. President Obama proposes to impose a financial crisis responsibility fee on large U.S. financial institutions. The fee, if enacted, would raise an estimated $30 billion in additional revenue over 10 years.

Carried interest. The president's FY 2012 budget proposes to tax carried interest as ordinary income. This proposal would raise an estimated $14.8 billion in additional revenue over 10 years.

Insurance company reforms. Insurance companies are subject to specific and very technical tax rules. President Obama proposes to overhaul the tax rules for insurance companies. If enacted, these reforms would raise an estimated $14 billion over 10 years.

These are just some of the revenue raisers in the president's FY 2012 budget. All of them will be extensively debated in Congress in the coming months. Our office will keep you posted on developments. If you have any questions about the president's FY 2012 budget proposals, please contact our office.

Close

The tax rules surrounding the dependency exemption deduction on a federal income tax return can be complicated, with many requirements involving who qualifies for the deduction and who qualifies to take the deduction. The deduction can be a very beneficial tax break for taxpayers who qualify to claim dependent children or other qualifying dependent family members on their return. Therefore, it is important to understand the nuances of claiming dependents on your tax return, as the April 18 tax filing deadline is just around the corner.

Dependency deduction

You are allowed one dependency exemption deduction for each person you claim as a qualifying dependent on your federal income tax return. The deduction amount for the 2010 tax year is $3,650. If someone else may claim you as a dependent on their return, however, then you cannot claim a personal exemption (also $3,650) for yourself on your return. Additionally, your standard deduction will be limited.

Only one taxpayer may claim the dependency exemption per qualifying dependent in a tax year. Therefore, you and your spouse (or former spouse in a divorce situation) cannot both claim an exemption for the same dependent, such as your son or daughter, when you are filing separate returns.

Who qualifies as a dependent?

The term "dependent" includes a qualifying child or a qualifying relative. There are a number of tests to determine who qualifies as a dependent child or relative, and who may claim the deduction. These include age, relationship, residency, return filing status, and financial support tests.

The rules regarding who is a qualifying child (not a qualifying relative, which is discussed below), and for whom you may claim a dependency deduction on your 2010 return, generally are as follows:

-- The child is a U.S. citizen, or national, or a resident of the U.S., Canada, or Mexico;

-- The child is your child (including adopted or step-children), grandchildren, great-grandchildren, brothers, sisters (including step-brothers, and -sisters), half-siblings, nieces, and nephews;

-- The child has lived with you a majority of nights during the year, whether or not he or she is related to you;

-- The child receives less than $3,650 of gross income (unless the dependent is your child and either (1) is under age 19, (2) is a full-time student under age 24 before the end of the year), or (3) any age if permanently and totally disabled;

-- The child receives more than one-half of his or her support from you; and

-- The child does not file a joint tax return (unless solely to obtain a tax refund).

Qualifying relatives

The rules for claiming a qualifying relative as a dependent on your income tax return are slightly different from the rules for claiming a dependent child. Certain tests must also be met, including a gross income and support test, and a relationship test, among others. Generally, to claim a "qualifying relative" as your dependent:

-- The individual cannot be your qualifying child or the qualifying child of any other taxpayer; -- The individual's gross income for the year is less than $3,650; -- You provide more than one-half of the individual's total support for the year; -- The individual either (1) lives with you all year as a member of your household or (2) does not live with you but is your brother or sister (include step and half-siblings), mother or father, grandparent or other direct ancestor, stepparent, niece, nephew, aunt, or uncle, or inlaws. Foster parents are excluded.

Although age is a factor when claiming a qualifying child, a qualifying relative can be any age.

Special rules for divorced and separated parents

Certain rules apply when parents are divorced or separated and want to claim the dependency exemption. Under these rules, generally the "custodial" parent may claim the dependency deduction. The custodial parent is generally the parent with whom the child resides for the greater number of nights during the year.

However, if certain conditions are met, the noncustodial parent may claim the dependency exemption. The noncustodial parent can generally claim the deduction if:

-- The custodial parent gives up the tax deduction by signing a written release (on Form 8332 or a similar statement) that he or she will not claim the child as a dependent on his or her tax return. The noncustodial parent must attach the statement to his or her tax return; or

-- There is a multiple support agreement (Form 2120, Multiple Support Declaration) in effect signed by the other parent agreeing not to claim the dependency deduction for the year.

Close

Legislation enacted during the past few years, including the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 and the more recently enacted Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (2010 Tax Relief Act), contains a number of important tax law changes that affect 2011. Key changes for 2011 affect both individuals and businesses. Certain tax breaks you benefited from in 2010, or before, may have changed in amount, timing, or may no longer be available in 2011. However, new tax incentives may be valuable. This article highlights some of the significant tax changes for 2011.

New payroll tax cut for wage earners

New for calendar 2011 is a payroll tax cut for wage earners and self-employed individuals. The payroll tax cut, as provided by the 2010 Tax Relief Act, reduces the employee's share of Social Security taxes by two percent, from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent, for all wages earned during the 2011 calendar year, up to the taxable wage base of $106,800. Future Social Security is not affected by the payroll tax cut.

Many workers can expect to see an average tax savings of more than $1,000 as a result of the new payroll tax cut. For example, a single individual who earns $40,000 annually and is paid weekly will see an extra $15 in her paycheck every week. A single individual who earns $60,000 annually and is paid bi-weekly will see an extra $46 in her paycheck.

Self-employed individuals also benefit from the payroll tax cut. Self-employed individuals will pay 10.4 percent on self-employment income up to the threshold.

Payroll companies and employers are responsible for implementing the payroll tax cut; employees do not need to adjust their withholding or take any other action. However, it is always a good decision regardless to review your withholding to ensure you are not withholding too much or too little.

No more Making Work Pay Credit. The payroll tax cut replaces the Making Work Pay Credit (MWPC), which expired at the end of 2010 and was not renewed for 2011. The MWPC provided a refundable tax credit of up to $400 for qualified single individuals and up to $800 for married taxpayers filing joint returns for 2009 and 2010.

Residential energy improvement credits

For individuals who may be making energy-efficient improvements to their homes in 2011 important changes have taken place for a popular tax credit. The 2010 Tax Relief Act extended the Code Sec. 25C nonbusiness energy efficient property credit for homeowners for one year, through December 31, 2011. However, more restrictive rules apply for 2011 than applied in 2010. Effective for property placed in service after December 31, 2010, an individual is entitled to a credit against tax in an amount equal to:

10 percent of the amount paid or incurred for qualified energy efficiency improvements (building envelope components) installed during the tax year, and
The amount of residential energy property expenditures paid or incurred during the tax year.

The maximum credit allowable is $500 over the lifetime of the taxpayer. The $500 amount must be reduced by the aggregate amount of previously allowed credits the taxpayer received in 2006, 2007, 2009 and 2010. There are certain restrictions on the amounts claimed for certain items as well. The amount claimed for windows and skylights in a year can not exceed $200 less the total of the credits you claimed for these items in all earlier tax years ending after December 31, 2005. The credit also can not exceed:

-- $50 for an advanced main circulating fan;
-- $150 for any qualified natural gas, propane, or hot water boiler; and
-- $300 for any item of energy efficient property

Energy-efficient credit for contractors

The 2010 Tax Relief Act retroactively extends the new energy efficient home credit for eligible contractors for two years, through December 31, 2011. Eligible contractors can claim a credit of $2,000 or $1,000 for each qualified new energy efficient home either constructed by the contractor or acquired by a person from the contractor for use as a residence during the tax year.

Annuity contracts

Beginning in 2011, taxpayers may partially annuitize non-retirement plan annuity payments they receive from an annuity contract. This partial annuitization applies to amounts you receive in tax years beginning after December 31, 2010 and applies to such an annuity, endowment or life insurance contract. If you receive an annuity for a period of 10 years or longer, or over one or more lives, under any portion of the annuity, endowment or life insurance contract, that portion is treated as a separate contract for purposes of annuity taxation.

FSAs, HSAs and Archers MSAs

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act enacted in 2010 places new limits on flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), health savings accounts (HSAs) and Archer medical savings accounts (Archer MSAs). After December 31, 2010, a distribution from an FSA, HSA or Archer MSA for a medicine or drug is a tax-free qualified medical expense only if the medicine or drug is a prescribed drug (determined without regard to whether such drug is available without a prescription) or is insulin. Additionally, for distributions made after 2010, the additional tax on distributions from an HSA that are not used for qualified medical expenses increases significantly, from 10 percent to 20 percent of the disbursed amount. The additional tax on distributions from an Archer MSA that are not used for qualified medical expenses increases from 15 percent to 20 percent of the disbursed amount.

Simple Cafeteria Plans for small employers

Beginning January 1, 2011, certain small employers can adopt "simple cafeteria plans," which provide certain nontaxable benefits to employees. Eligible employers generally include those with an average of 100 or fewer employees on business days during either of the two preceding tax years. Benefits of simple cafeteria plans can include certain medical coverage, group-term life insurance, flexible spending accounts (FSAs), and dependent care assistance.

New electronic filing rules for employers

Nearly all employers must use the IRS Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS) for federal tax payments made in 2011. Beginning after December 31, 2010, employers must use electronic funds transfer (EFT) to make all federal tax deposits, including deposits of employment tax, excise tax, and corporate income tax. After December 31, 2010, Forms 8109 and 8109-B, Federal Tax Deposit Coupon, can no longer be used.

Employer payroll tax forgiveness expires

Qualified employers who hired unemployed workers after February 3, 2010 and prior to January 1, 2011 may have been eligible for payroll tax forgiveness. The Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (HIRE Act) provided temporary forgiveness of the employer-share of Social Security tax for eligible new-hires. For each worker retained for at least a year, businesses may claim an additional general business tax credit, up to $1,000 per worker, when they file their 2011 income tax returns.

New broker basis reporting rules

Beginning in 2011, generally all brokers who are required to file information returns reporting gross proceeds of a "covered security" (such as corporate stock), must include in the return the customer's adjusted basis in the security. A broker must report the adjusted basis and type of gain (long term or short term gain or loss) for most stock acquired on or after January 1, 2011.

Reporting is generally undertaken on Form 1099-B, Proceeds from Broker and Barter Exchange Transactions. A "covered security" includes all stock acquired beginning in 2011, as mentioned above, except for stock in a mutual fund (regulated investment company or RIC) or stock acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan (DRP). Reporting for these and other types of securities and options will need to be reported beginning after 2012 and 2013.

Real estate reporting requirements

Beginning in 2011, taxpayers receiving rental income from real estate who make payments of $600 or more during the tax year to a service provider (excluding incorporated entities) must provide an information return to the IRS, as well as the provider, reporting the payments. Typically, the information is to be reported on Form 1099-Misc. Certain exceptions, such as for hardship or active members of the uniformed services or employees of the intelligence community apply.

These are just some of the many important tax changes that expired at the end of 2010 or take effect this year. Please contact our office if you have any questions.

Close

On December 17, 2010 President Obama signed into law the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (2010 Tax Relief Act). This sweeping new tax law includes a two-year extension of the Bush-era tax cuts, including extension of the current, lower individual tax rates and capital gains/dividend tax rates. The new tax law - the largest in over ten years - also includes a temporary estate tax compromise, as well as the extension of many popular individual and business tax incentives, an alternative minimum tax (AMT) "patch" for 2010 and 2011, 100 percent bonus depreciation for businesses, and more. The much-anticipated legislation provides tax relief to taxpayers across-the-board. Here is a review of the 2010 Tax Relief Act's major provisions:

Individuals

Income tax rates. Among the most valuable tax breaks for individuals in the new law is a two-year extension of individual income tax rate reductions. The new law retains the current 10, 15, 25, 28, 33, and 35 percent individual tax rates for two years, through December 31, 2012. If Congress had not passed this extension, the individual tax rates would have jumped significantly for all income levels.

The new law also extends the full repeal of the limitation on itemized deductions and the personal exemption phaseout for higher-income taxpayers, through December 31, 2012.

Capital gains/dividends. The new law extends reduced capital gains and dividend tax rates for two years, through December 31, 2012. For 2011 and 2012, individuals in the 10 and 15 percent rate brackets can continue to take advantage of a zero percent capital gains and dividend tax rate. Individuals in higher rate brackets will enjoy a maximum tax rate of 15 percent on capital gains and dividends, as opposed to a 20 percent rate on capital gains and ordinary income tax rates on dividends.

Marriage penalty relief. Married couples filing jointly will benefit from provisions designed to provide relief from the marriage penalty. For 2010, the standard deduction for a married couple filing a joint return is twice the single taxpayer's amount. The 2010 Tax Relief Act extends the increased standard deduction for married taxpayers for two years, through December 31, 2012. The 2010 Tax Relief Act extends the expanded 15 percent rate bracket for married couples filing a joint return for two years, through December 31, 2012.

Payroll tax cut. The new law provides a payroll tax cut for employees. Effective for calendar year 2011, the employee share of the OASDI portion of Social Security taxes is reduced from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent, up to the taxable wage base of $106,800. Self-employed individuals will get an equivalent tax break, paying 10.4 percent on self-employment income up to the wage base (reduced from the normal 12.4 percent rate). The payroll tax cut replaces the Making Work Pay credit that has been in place for 2009 and 2010, but generally offers a much higher benefit. Unlike the Making Work Pay credit, the payroll tax cut does not exclude individuals based on their earnings. Thus the payroll tax cut can provide significantly higher benefits -- a maximum payroll tax reduction of $2,136 on wages, compared to a maximum $800 Making Work Pay credit for married couples filing jointly and $400 for unmarried individuals.

AMT patch. The new law provides an AMT "patch" for 2010 as well as 2011 at higher exemption amounts. The 2010 Tax Relief Act raises the exemption amounts for 2010 to $47,450 for individuals, $72,450 for married taxpayers filing joint returns, and $36,225 for married taxpayers filing separately. For 2011, the amounts are increased to $48,450 for individuals, $74,450 for married taxpayers filing jointly, and $37,225 for married taxpayers filing separately.

More incentives. Along with all these incentives, the new law extends many popular but temporary tax breaks. Extended for 2011 and 2012 are:

$1,000 child tax credit;
Enhanced earned income tax credit;
Adoption credit with modifications;
The enhanced dependent care credit; and
Deduction for certain mortgage insurance premiums.

The new law also extends retroactively some other valuable tax incentives for individuals that expired at the end of 2009. These incentives are extended for 2010 and 2011 and include:

State and local sales tax deduction;
Teacher's classroom expense deduction;
Charitable contributions of IRA proceeds; and
Charitable contributions of appreciated property for conservation purposes.

Businesses

Bonus depreciation. Businesses can use bonus depreciation to immediately write off a percentage of the cost of depreciable property. The new law provides 100 percent bonus depreciation for qualified investments made after September 8, 2010 and before January 1, 2012. It also continues bonus depreciation, albeit at 50 percent, on property placed in service after December 31, 2011 and before January 1, 2013. There are special rules for certain longer-lived and transportation property. Additionally, certain taxpayers may claim refundable credits in lieu of bonus depreciation.

Code Sec. 179 expensing. Along with bonus depreciation, the new law also provides for enhanced Code Sec. 179 expensing for 2012. Under current law, the Code Sec. 179 dollar and investment limits are $500,000 and $2 million, respectively, for tax years beginning in 2010 and 2011. The new law provides for a $125,000 dollar limit (indexed for inflation) and a $500,000 investment limit (indexed for inflation) for tax years beginning in 2012 (but not after). Otherwise, those caps would have dropped to a $25,000/$200,000 level.

Research credit. Congress extended the research tax credit for two years, for 2010 and 2011.

More incentives. Other valuable business incentives in the new law include extensions of:

100 percent exclusion of gain from qualified small business stock;
Transit benefits parity;
Work Opportunity Tax Credit (with modifications);
New Markets Tax Credit (with modifications);
Differential wage credit;
Brownfields remediation;
Active financing exception/look-through treatment for CFCs;
Tax incentives for empowerment zones; and
Special rules for charitable deductions by corporations and other businesses.

Energy Tax Breaks

Businesses. The new law extends some energy tax breaks for businesses. One of the most valuable energy incentives is the Code Sec. 1603 cash grant in lieu of tax credits. This incentive encourages the development of alternative energy sources, such as wind energy. Other business energy incentives extended by the new law include excise tax and other credits for alternative fuels, percentage depletion for oil and gas from marginal wells, and other targeted incentives.

Individuals. The new law also extends some popular energy tax incentives for individuals. Individuals who made energy efficiency improvements to their homes in 2009 or 2010 can benefit from the Code Sec. 25C energy tax credit, which rewards individuals who install energy efficient furnaces, add insulation, or make other similar improvements to reduce energy usage. The new law extends the credit through 2011 but reduces some of its benefits.

Education

The Tax Code includes a number of incentives to encourage individuals to save for education expenses. Many incentives are temporary and expired at the end of 2009, or were set to expire at the end of 2010. The new law extends for two years, through December 31, 2012, the following popular education tax breaks:

The American Opportunity Tax Credit (previously the Hope education credit);
Student loan interest deduction;
Exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance;
Enhanced Coverdell education savings accounts; and
Special rules for certain scholarships.

The higher education tuition deduction was extended through 2011.

Estate and gift taxes

Beginning in 2011, the estate tax had been scheduled to revert to its pre-2001 levels of a 55 percent tax rate and a $1 million exclusion. For 2010, estates were subject to no federal estate tax but heirs had to take inherited property under a modified carryover tax basis regime.

Estate tax. The new law revives the estate tax through 2012, but at a reduced maximum estate tax rate of 35 percent and a $5 million exclusion. The revived estate tax applies to estates of decedents dying in 2011 and 2012. However, for 2010, the new law gives estates the option to apply the estate tax at the 35 percent/$5 million level, with a stepped-up basis, or to elect no estate tax but with modified carryover basis. The new law also allows "portability" between spouses of the maximum exclusion (for a combined $10 million benefit) and extends some other taxpayer-friendly provisions originally enacted in 2001.

This far-reaching tax package affects almost every taxpayer. Please contact our office if you have any questions on how you can start maximizing your savings within this sweeping $800 billion tax law.

Close

Congress not only extended the current, lower individual income tax rates through 2012 in the recently enacted Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 (2010 Tax Relief Act); it also extended a number of beneficial tax breaks for families and individuals. Through 2012, the law extended significant tax incentives for education, children, and energy-saving home improvements.

Individual Tax Rates

The 2010 Tax Relief Act extends all of the current lower individual tax rates across the board, for all taxpayers, at 10, 15, 25, 28, 33, and 35 percent for two years, through 2012. In addition, under the new law the size of the 15 percent tax bracket for married couples filing jointly and surviving spouses remains double that of the 15 percent tax bracket for individual filers, thus continuing to provide "marriage penalty" relief.

State and local sales tax deduction. Congress also extended the deduction for state and local sales taxes in lieu of the state and local income tax deduction through 2011.

More marriage penalty relief

In addition to expanding the 15 percent income tax rate bracket, the 2010 Tax Relief Act also maintains the increased basic standard deduction for joint filers. Through 2012, the standard deduction for married taxpayers filing a joint return (and surviving spouses) is twice the basic standard deduction amount for single individuals. For example, the standard deduction for individuals for 2011 is $5,800; for married taxpayers filing jointly, the standard deduction for 2011 will be $11,600.

No personal exemption phaseout

Higher-income individuals and families will also benefit from the ability to claim an unreduced personal exemption. Before 2010, taxpayers with income over certain amounts were subject to phaseout of their personal exemption. However, under the 2010 Tax Relief Act, personal exemptions are not reduced, for an additional two years through 2012.

Expanded child tax credit

The 2010 Tax Relief Act extends the $1,000 child tax credit for two years, through December 31, 2012. The child tax credit can be claimed for each qualifying child under age 17 (at the close of the year) that the taxpayer can claim as a dependent. However, the amount of the credit is reduced as a taxpayer's income increases. The credit is reduced (but not below zero) by $50 for each $1,000 of modified adjusted gross income (AGI) above $110,000 for joint filers and above $75,000 for others. The new law also extends other enhancements to the credit, including the ability to offset both the regular tax and alternative minimum tax.

Expanded earned income tax credit

The 2010 Tax Relief Act extends the enhanced earned income tax credit (EITC) for two years, through 2012. The new law also simplifies computation of the EITC.

Adoption credit

Through 2012, the new law expands the adoption credit and the exclusion from income for employer-provided adoption assistance. However, the new law does not extend certain changes made by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) for 2010 and 2011. Therefore, the credit is not refundable after 2011 and the additional $1,000 under the PPACA is not available after 2011. For 2012, the maximum credit therefore is $12,170 (indexed for inflation after 2010) and is phased out ratably for taxpayers with modified AGI over $182,520.

Dependent care credit

The 2010 Tax Relief Act extends the enhanced dependent care credit for two years, through 2012. A taxpayer who incurs expenses to care for a child under age 13 or for an incapacitated dependent or spouse, in order to enable the taxpayer to work or look for work, is eligible to claim the dependent care credit. The maximum expenses that can be claimed through 2012 are $3,000 for one qualifying individual and $6,000 for more than one qualifying individual. Additionally, the maximum credit rate is 35 percent. Thus, for 2010, the maximum dependent care credit is $1,050 (35 percent of up to $3,000 of eligible expenses) for one qualifying individual and $2,100 for more than one qualifying individual (35 percent of up to $6,000 of qualified eligible expenses).

Tax breaks for education

The 2010 Tax Relief Act extends a number of tax incentives to help defray the costs of education. The new law extends the American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC), the student loan interest deduction, the exclusion from income for employer-provided assistance, and more. The AOTC, which is 40 percent refundable, can be claimed for expenses incurred for the first four years of a student's post-secondary education. The credit equals 100 percent of the first $2,000 of qualified higher education tuition and related expenses (including course materials), and 25 percent of the next $2,000 of expenses. In effect, a maximum credit of $2,500 a year can be claimed for each eligible student.

Through 2012, employees who receive educational assistance from their employer can continue to exclude up to $5,250 in employer-provided educational assistance from their income and employment taxes. Graduate school tuition also qualifies for the exclusion.

Taxpayers will also continue to benefit from the $2,500 above-the-line student loan interest deduction through 2012. The new law also expanded the modified AGI range for the phaseout of the deduction. For 2010, for instance, the deduction phases out ratably for taxpayers with modified AGI between $60,000 and $75,000 ($120,000 and $150,000 for joint filers).

Coverdell education savings accounts (ESAs) provide taxpayers with another mechanism to save for education. The 2010 Tax Relief Act enables taxpayers to continue to contribute up to $2,000 a year to a Coverdell ESA for beneficiaries under age 18 (as well as special needs beneficiaries of any age). In addition to higher education expenses, Coverdell ESAs can be used to pay for elementary and secondary education expenses through 2012. However, the amount that can be contributed is subject to income phaseouts.

Incentives for energy-efficient improvements

The 2010 Tax Relief Act also rewards individuals and families who make energy-saving improvements to their home. For example, the new law extends through 2011 (only one year) the popular Code Sec. 25C tax credit, which provides a credit for expenses for qualified energy efficiency improvements and property, such as furnaces, water heaters, insulation materials, exterior windows, skylights, doors, and other items.

Close

With the end of the 2010 tax year rapidly approaching, there is only a limited amount of time for individuals to take advantage of certain tax savings techniques. This article highlights some last-minute tax planning tips before the end of the year.

Make a charitable contribution by cash or credit card. Charitable contributions can be made at any time, in cash or in property. Taxpayers may also want to accelerate dues and fees for church or synagogue memberships. While a pledge is not deductible, an actual payment will qualify when the payment is made, not when it is received. Thus, putting a check in the mail qualifies as a payment when the payer gives up control of the check (assuming there are sufficient funds and the check is eventually honored), not when the check is received, deposited, or honored.

Charging a contribution is another means of accelerating payment. Payment by credit card is in effect a loan to the payer and is deductible when the charge is made, not when the bill is paid or the charge is honored. Thus, if you make the charge in 2010 but it is not honored until 2011, you can still take the charitable deduction on your 2010 return. Payment by debit card again is a payment when the transaction occurs, even if the amount is not debited until the following day.

Note: special rules may apply to contributions of property, especially motor vehicles.

Adjust withholding. State and local income taxes are deductible when withheld, paid as estimated taxes or paid with a return. If you anticipate owing taxes for 2010, you can increase withholding or make an additional payment to cover the expected liability. The payment must be made in good faith and be based on a reasonable estimate of your tax liability. Taxpayers paying estimated taxes can make the final payment before the end of 2010.

Itemized deductions. In past years, there have been limits on itemized deductions taken by higher-income taxpayers. These limits do not apply in 2010, so taxpayers should not feel constrained to limit their payments and contributions. For higher-income taxpayers, this is especially beneficial.

Deduction for health insurance costs. If you are self-employed, you can take a deduction for your health insurance costs when computing self-employment tax and the self-employment tax deduction.

Small business stock. If you sell qualified small business stock before January 1, 2011, and are eligible for the increased exclusion from income, you may be able to exclude 100 percent of the gains from the sale of stock. Speak with your tax professional before selling such stock, however, since the rules on eligibility and holding periods can be complex. For a majority of taxpayers, the traditional rules for accelerating/deferring income and/or maximizing or deferring deductions to lower your tax bill may still apply in 2010, despite the threat of higher income tax rates next year still possible. Depending on your situation, you may want to:

- Accelerate income if possible, including bonuses, into 2010;
- Defer selling capital assets at a loss until 2011 and later years;
- Sell capital assets that have appreciated in 2010 to take advantage of the lower capital gains rates (the maximum capital gains rate is 15 percent for 2010);
- Move some assets into tax-free instruments, like municipal bonds, that are not subject to federal tax;
- Accelerate billings and/or provide incentives for clients or customers to make payments in 2010 (if you are a self-employed and/or cash-basis taxpayer);
- Take taxable retirement plan distributions before 2011 (for taxpayers over age 59 1/2); and
- Bunch itemized or business deductions into the 2011 tax year.

Maximize "above-the-line" deductions. Above-the-line deductions are especially valuable because they reduce your adjusted gross income (AGI). Many tax benefits may be limited for taxpayers whose AGI is too high. Common above-the-line deductions include contributions to traditional Individual Retirement Account (IRA) and Health Savings Account (HSA), moving expenses, self-employed health insurance costs, and alimony payments.

Claim "green" credits. You may be able to claim tax credits for purchasing particular property. Certain hybrid cars, such as the Nissan Altima, qualify for an energy credit under Code Sec. 30B. It may be necessary to consult with an auto dealer or check IRS rulings to see what credits are in effect, because the credit for a qualifying "green" vehicle phases out over time and eventually is reduced to zero.

Another credit available for "green" taxpayers is the residential energy credit. The credit is 30 percent, up to a total of $1,500, of certain energy-efficient improvements made by a homeowner to his or her principal residence during 2009 and 2010. For example, the credit can be claimed by installing energy efficient windows and doors.

Make a tax-free gift. You can gift, tax-free, up to $13,000 per donee in 2010. A married couple can apply a combined exclusion of $26,000 to a gift of property for one person. Further amounts to any one taxpayer will be offset by the donor's lifetime exclusion before gift tax is owed. The exclusion applies per year. If it is not used, it is lost; it does not carry over to the succeeding year.

Use an installment sale. If you may be selling property at a gain, you can avoid recognizing the entire gain by using an installment sale. An installment sale has at least one payment after the year of sale. The payment is taxed when it is made, not at the time of the sale. Thus, income can be postponed. The installment method is not available for stocks and bonds, however.

There can be competing considerations, however. Tax rates may increase in 2011 and future years, although perhaps only for the highest-income taxpayers. Still, the amount of gain included in a future payment could be taxed at a higher rate. The 3.8 percent Medicare tax imposed on certain income starting in 2013 also is a factor.

Take your required minimum distributions (RMDs). RMDs have returned for 2010. Although Congress temporarily suspended the RMD requirements for distributions from IRAs and other retirement accounts in 2009, it did not extend this benefit into 2010. Therefore, taxpayers who are age 70 or older must take their RMD from a traditional IRA (Roth IRAs are not subject to the RMD rules), 401(k) or other retirement accounts by December 31. Failure to do so will subject you to a stiff penalty of 50 percent of the amount you were required to withdraw but failed to. However, for taxpayers who turned age 70 in 2010, you have until April 1, 2011 to take your first RMD.

These are just a few last-minute tax planning strategies you may want to consider as year-end approaches. As always, please contact our office if you have any questions.

Close

A business can deduct ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in carrying on any trade or business. The expense must be reasonable and must be helpful to the business.

Gifts to a business client, customer or contact can be deductible business expenses. However, the maximum deduction for gifts to any individual is $25 per year (Code Sec. 274(b)). A gift is any item that is excluded from income under Code Sec. 102. Gifts that cost $4.00 or less, as well as promotional items, are not subject to the $25 limitation.

Gifts by individuals to co-workers are normally considered nondeductible personal expenses. However, employee achievement awards ($400 limit) and qualified plan awards are not subject to the $25 limitation.

Substantiation

Taxpayers must be able to substantiate certain business expenses by adequate records or sufficient evidence to take them as a deduction. Substantiation is required for business gifts, as well as traveling, lodging and entertainment expenses, because they are considered more susceptible to abuse (Tax Code Sec. 274(d)).

For business gifts, IRS regulations require that taxpayers substantiate the following elements of the gift:

- Amount (the cost to the taxpayer);
- Time (the date of the gift);
- Description of the gift;
- Business purpose - the business reason for the gift, or the nature of the business benefit derived or expected to be derived as a result of the gift; and
- Business relationship - occupation or other information relating to the recipient, including name, title and other designation, sufficient to establish the business relationship to the taxpayer.

The IRS provides substantiation rules in Treasury Reg. 1.274-5T(c). The taxpayer must maintain and produce, on request, "adequate records" or "sufficient evidence" that corroborate the taxpayer's own statement. Written evidence has "considerably more probative value" than oral evidence alone. While a contemporaneous log is not required, written evidence is more effective the closer in time it relates to the expense. Support by sufficient documentary evidence is highly credible.

Adequate records

Adequate records include an account book, diary, log, statement of expenses or similar records, as well as documentary evidence, which in combination establish each element of the expense. However, it is not necessary to record information that duplicates information on a receipt. The record should be prepared at or near the time of the expenditure, when the taxpayer has full present knowledge of each element. A statement, such as a weekly log, submitted by an employee to his employer in the regular course of good business practice is considered an adequate record.

An adequate record of business purpose generally requires a written statement of business purpose. However, the degree of substantiation will vary depending on the facts and circumstances.

Sufficient evidence

A taxpayer that does not have adequate records may establish an element by other sufficient evidence, such as the taxpayer's written or oral statement with specific, detailed information, and other corroborative evidence. A description of a gift shall be direct evidence, such as a detailed statement by the recipient or documentary evidence otherwise required as an adequate record.

If the taxpayer loses records through circumstances beyond the taxpayer's control, the taxpayer may substantiate the deduction by reasonably reconstructing his expenditures.

Close

When you experience a change in employment, probably the last thing on your mind is your 401(k) plan distribution. There are a number of options to choose from when determining what to do with your 401(k) when changing employment - from keeping your account with your past employer, taking it with you, cashing out, or rolling the amounts over into a different account. However, mishandling this transaction can have detrimental tax effects, so make sure that you understand all aspects of the distribution options available to you and act accordingly before you walk out the door.

Often, individuals leave their 401(k) plans with their past employer because of confusion about the options. Generally, there are five moves departing employees can make regarding their 401(k) plans:

Take the cash. Cashing out of a 401(k) plan is rarely a wise decision. Although leaving your job with a nice roll of cash in your pocket sounds tempting (especially if you don't have another job lined up and are short on cash), this decision comes at a very high price. If you cash out of your plan, your current employer is required to withhold 20 percent of the amount for federal income taxes, on top of any state income tax withholding that will be required. Moreover, you face federal income taxes on the distribution (as well as any state income taxes) and a 10 percent penalty tax on the distributed amount if you are under the age of 59 and 1/2 at the time of the distribution. In total, these taxes could eat up over half of your distribution. Additionally, when you cash out of your plan you lose out on the opportunity for continued tax-deferral and tax-compounding of the amount in your account.

Roll your funds over into an IRA. An IRA rollover is probably the most popular option for handling a distribution upon a change of employment due to the high level of flexibility and control that the taxpayer has over the funds. With an IRA rollover, you have the ability to take your time to consider the other options such as taking the distribution in cash or investing the funds in your new employer's qualified plan. You also have a great amount of flexibility as to how the funds are invested.

Keep in mind, however, that only pre-tax contributions and earnings accumulated in your current 401(k) plan will be eligible for rollover into an IRA. After-tax contributions, distributions of substantially equal periodic payments, and minimum required distributions are not eligible for rollover into the IRA.

Important note: The transfer of funds between your former employer's plan and your IRA rollover account must qualify as a direct, or "trustee-to-trustee", rollover to avoid the 20 percent withholding requirement. When you receive the distribution check (it will be in the name of the IRA trustee), you have 60 days to deposit it into your IRA account to qualify for rollover treatment.

Invest in your new employer's plan. You may be able to roll your 401(k) account from your past employer into a plan maintained by your new employer. Although your new employer is not required to accept your 401(k) rollover, most do. Thus, your new employer may allow you to invest your 401(k) distribution in the new company's qualified retirement plan. However, only pre-tax contributions and earnings accumulated in your current 401(k) plan will be eligible for this type of rollover. After-tax contributions, distributions of substantially equal periodic payments, and minimum required distributions are not eligible for rollover into the new plan.

Note. The transfer of funds between your former employer and your new employer must qualify as a direct, or "trustee-to-trustee", rollover to avoid the 20% withholding requirement. When you receive the distribution check (it will be in the name of the new employer's plan trustee), your new employer must deposit it into the new company's plan within 60 days to qualify for rollover treatment.

Keep your funds in your current plan. If you have been satisfied with your company's plan performance in the past, have significant after-tax moneys in the fund, and/or you just don't want to make a decision on your distribution at this time, you may have the option of leaving your 401(k) funds where they are with your previous employer. Keep in mind that this option is not a given and is at the discretion of your former employer. For example, employers may not permit departing employees to remain in their 401(k) if the account value is less than $5,000, since maintaining accounts with small values creates administrative burdens. Generally, former employees are also not allowed to add to the account maintained with the past employer and can not borrow against the funds in the 401(k).

One important thing to consider here though is whether keeping your funds with your former employer will limit distribution or access options since you are no longer an employee of the company. Contact your company's benefits department to determine if there are any restrictions that you should know about.

Roll over your 401(k) into a Roth account. Beginning in 2010, all individuals, regardless of income or filing status, can roll over a 401(k) into a Roth IRA. Prior to 2010, eligibility for rolling over a 401(k) into a Roth IRA was limited to individuals with adjusted gross incomes that did not exceed $100,000. This move may be a beneficial if you expect to be in a higher tax rate bracket in retirement than you are now, since qualified distributions from a Roth IRA are tax-free. However, you will pay tax on the amount rolled over into the Roth IRA. If you roll over your 401(k) into a Roth account in 2010, you can elect to recognize the amount subject to tax ratably in 2011 and 2012. However, talk with your financial or tax advisor about this and other options, since as of now, the individual income tax rate brackets are scheduled to rise beginning in 2011 as the lower Bush-era tax rates sunset on December 31, 2010.

Since the distribution of funds from any retirement account can have serious tax consequences, when faced with a change of employment that may result in a distribution of any such funds, please contact the office for additional advice and guidance before you choose a distribution option.

Close

Congress has passed a small business jobs bill, the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (H.R. 5297), with valuable individual and business tax incentives totaling approximately $12 billion. Many of these tax incentives are temporary so you have only a short window of time in which to take advantage of them. Other tax incentives are permanent but require careful planning to maximize your tax benefits.

General business provisions

Bonus depreciation. An additional first-year depreciation deduction equal to 50 percent of the adjusted basis was available for qualified property placed in service in 2008 and 2009 (2009 and 2010 for certain longer-lived property and transportation property). The new law extends bonus depreciation for qualified property acquired and placed in service during 2010 (or placed in service during 2011 for certain longer-lived property and transportation property). The new law also includes a special long-term accounting rule for bonus depreciation.

Code Sec. 280F. The limitation under Code Sec. 280F on the amount of depreciation deductions allowed with respect to certain passenger automobiles is increased in the first year they are used in a business by $8,000 for automobiles that qualify and for which the taxpayer does not elect out of the additional first-year deduction. For 2010, therefore, maximum first-year depreciation for passenger automobiles is $11,060.

Code Sec. 179 expensing. The new law increases the maximum amount a taxpayer may expense under Code Sec. 179 to $500,000 and raises the phase-out threshold to $2 million. Enhanced Code Sec. 179 expensing is available for tax years beginning in 2010 and 2011. The new law also allows taxpayers to expense qualified leasehold investment property, qualified restaurant property and qualified retail improvement property. The maximum amount with respect to real property that may be expensed, however, is limited to $250,000.

Start-up business expenses. A certain amount of qualified business start-up expenses may be deductible in the tax year in which the active trade or business begins. The new law doubles the amount of start-up expenditures that a taxpayer may elect to deduct from $5,000 to $10,000 for tax years beginning in 2010. The new law also increases the deduction phase-out threshold so that the $10,000 is reduced, but not below zero, by the amount by which the cumulative cost of qualified start-up expenses exceeds $60,000.

S corporation built-in gains tax. A C corporation that converts to an S corporation generally must hold any appreciated assets for 10 years following the conversion or, if disposed of earlier, pay tax on the appreciation at the highest corporate level rate (currently 35 percent). The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act) temporarily shortened the usual 10-year holding period to seven years for dispositions in tax years beginning in 2009 and 2010. The new law further shortens the holding period to five years in the case of any tax year beginning in 2011, if the fifth year in the recognition period precedes the tax year beginning in 2011.

Cell phones. In 1989, the IRS identified employer-provided cell phones as “listed property.” For listed property, no deduction is allowed unless a taxpayer adequately substantiates the expense and business usage of the property. The listed property designation was imposed on cell phones when they were novel, expensive, and not many individuals owned one. The new law removes cell phones from the definition of listed property for tax years beginning after December 31, 2009.

Small business provisions

Small business stock. To encourage investment in small businesses, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 temporarily increased the percentage exclusion for qualified small business stock acquired after February 17, 2009 and before January 1, 2011 to 75 percent. The new law raises the exclusion to 100 percent for qualified stock issued after the date of enactment and before January 1, 2011. The stock must be acquired at original issue from a qualified small business and held for at least five years.

General business credit. The new law extends the carryback period for eligible small business credits from one to five years. Eligible small business credits are defined for purposes of the new law as the sum of the general business credits determined for the tax year with respect to an eligible small business. An eligible small business is a corporation whose stock is not publicly traded, a partnership or a sole proprietorship. Additionally, the average annual gross receipts of the corporation, partnership, or sole proprietorship for the prior three tax year periods cannot exceed $50 million. The extended carryback provision is effective for credits determined in the taxpayer's first tax year beginning after December 31, 2009.

Code Sec. 6707A penalty relief.The new law reforms the Code Sec. 6707A penalty regime retroactively for taxpayers failing to disclose participation in reportable and listed transactions. Generally, the penalty would equal 75 percent of the reduction in tax reported on the participant's return as a result of the transaction or that would result if the transaction was respected for federal tax purposes. Under the new law, the maximum penalty for an individual for failing to disclose a reportable transaction is $10,000 ($100,000 in the case of a listed transaction). The maximum penalty for all other taxpayers for failing to disclose a reportable transaction is $50,000 ($200,000 for all other persons).

Individual tax incentives

Retirement savings. The new law includes several provisions to encourage retirement savings. With many employees now saving for retirement using 401(k) plans, the new law provides a major Roth conversion option that can mean significantly more dollars available at retirement. Under the new law, if a Code Sec. 401(k), 403(b) or governmental 457(b) plan now sets up a qualified designated Roth contribution program, a distribution to an employee or surviving spouse from a non-designated Roth account under a plan may be rolled over to a designated Roth account within the same plan. The planning challenge in such a rollover conversion to a designated Roth account is that the converted balance is considered taxable income at the time of conversion, requiring tax to be paid either from the proceeds themselves or from cash otherwise available to the taxpayer. If an amount is rolled over in 2010, however, the new law helps ease that tax liability by treating the taxable converted amount as included ratably in income in equal amounts for 2011 and 2012 unless the taxpayer elects otherwise. The designated Roth provisions in the new law are effective immediately.

Self-employment.Individuals who are self-employed may claim a deduction for qualified health insurance costs for income tax purposes. For self-employment taxes, the self-employed individual cannot deduct any health insurance costs. The new law allows the deduction for the cost of health insurance in calculating net earnings from self-employment for purposes of self-employment (FICA) taxes. The provision is temporary and only applies to the self-employed taxpayer's first tax year beginning after December 31, 2009.

The new law also allows partial annuitization of a nonqualified annuity contract. Holders of nonqualified annuities (annuity contracts held outside of a tax-qualified retirement plan or IRA) may elect to receive a portion of the contract in the form of a stream of annuity contracts, leaving the remainder of the contract to accumulate income on a tax-deferred basis. Only a portion of an annuity, endowment or life insurance contract may be annuitized while the balance is not annuitized. The annuitization period must be for 10 years or more, or for the lives of one or more individuals. The annuitization provision in the new law is effective for amounts received in tax years beginning after December 31, 2010. Annuitization requires careful planning; please contact our office for details.

Rental property expense payments

Among the new law'srevenue raising provisions is a new information reporting requirement that affects recipients of real estate rental income. Rental income recipients making payments of $600 or more to a service provider will file an information return with the IRS and the service provider. The new law permits the IRS to exclude individuals for whom reporting would be a hardship and individuals who receive only minimal amounts of rental income from the requirement. Certain members of the military and intelligence services are also excluded. The reporting provision applies to payments made after December 31, 2010. If you receive rental income, please contact our office for more information on these reporting requirements and if they apply to you.

Close

The health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) imposes a new 3.8 percent Medicare contribution tax on the investment income of higher-income individuals. Although the tax does not take effect until 2013, it is not too soon to examine methods to lessen the impact of the tax.

Net investment income

"Net investment income" includes interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents and other gross income attributable to a passive activity. Gains from the sale of property not used in an active business and income from the investment of working capital are also treated as investment income. Further, an individual's capital gains income will be subject to the tax. This includes gain from the sale of a principal residence, unless the gain is excluded from income under Code Sec. 121, and gains from the sale of a vacation home. However, contemplated sales made before 2013 would avoid the tax.

The tax applies to estates and trusts, on the lesser of undistributed net income or the excess of the trust/estate adjusted gross income (AGI) over the threshold amount ($11,200) for the highest tax bracket for trusts and estates, and to investment income they distribute.

However, the tax will not apply to nontaxable income, such as tax-exempt interest or veterans' benefits.

Deductions

Net investment income is gross income or net gain, reduced by deductions that are "properly allocable" to the income or gain. This is a key term that the Treasury Department expects to address in guidance, and which we will update on developments. For passively-managed real property, allocable expenses will still include depreciation and operating expenses. Indirect expenses such as tax preparation fees may also qualify.

For capital gain property, this formula puts a premium on keeping tabs on amounts that increase your property's basis. It also focuses on investment expenses that may reduce net gains: interest on loans to purchase investments, investment counsel and advice, and fees to collect income. Other costs, such as brokers' fees, may increase basis or reduce the amount realized from an investment. As such, taxpayers may want to consider avoiding installment sales with net capital gains (and interest) running past 2012.

Thresholds

The tax applies to the lesser of net investment income or modified AGI above $200,000 for individuals and heads of household, $250,000 for joint filers and surviving spouses, and $125,000 for married filing separately. MAGI is your AGI increased by any foreign earned income otherwise excluded under Code Sec. 911; MAGI is the same as AGI for someone who does not work overseas.

Example. Jim, a single individual, has modified AGI of $220,000 and net investment income of $40,000. The tax applies to the lesser of (i) net investment income ($40,000) or (ii) modified AGI ($220,000) over the threshold amount for an individual ($200,000), or $20,000. The tax is 3.8 percent of $20,000, or $760. In this case, the tax is not applied to the entire $40,000 of investment income.

Exceptions to the tax

Certain items and taxpayers are not subject to the 3.8 percent Medicare tax. A significant exception applies to distributions from qualified plans, 401(k) plans, tax-sheltered annuities, individual retirement accounts (IRAs), and eligible 457 plans. There is no exception for distributions from nonqualified deferred compensation plans subject to Code Sec. 409A. However, distributions from these plans (including amounts deemed as interest) are generally treated as compensation, not as investment income.

The exception for distributions from retirement plans suggests that potentially taxable investors may want to shift wages and investments to retirement plans such as 401(k) plans, 403(b) annuities, and IRAs, or to 409A deferred compensation plans. Increasing contributions will reduce income and may help you stay below the applicable thresholds. Small business owners may want to set up retirement plans, especially 401(k) plans, if they have not yet established a plan, and should consider increasing their contributions to existing plans.

Another exception is provided for income ordinarily derived from a trade or business that is not a passive activity under Code Sec. 469, such as a sole proprietorship. Investment income from an active trade or business is also excluded. However, SECA (Self-Employment Contributions Act) tax will still apply to proprietors and partners. Income from trading in financial instruments and commodities is also subject to the tax.

The additional 3.8 percent Medicare tax does not apply to income from the sale of an interest in a partnership or S corporation, to the extent that gain of the entity's property would be from an active trade or business. The tax also does not apply to business entities (such as corporations and limited liability companies), nonresident aliens (NRAs), charitable trusts that are tax-exempt, and charitable remainder trusts that are nontaxable under Code Sec. 664.

Income tax rates

In addition to the tax on investment income, certain other tax increases proposed by the Obama administration may take effect in 2011. The top two marginal income tax rates on individuals would rise from 33 and 35 percent to 36 and 39.6 percent, respectively. The maximum tax rate on long-term capital gains would increase from 15 percent to 20 percent. Moreover, dividends, which are currently capped at the 15 percent long-term capital gain rate, would be taxed as ordinary income. Thus, the cumulative rate on capital gains would increase to 23.8 percent in 2013, and the rate on dividends would jump to as much as 43.4 percent. Moreover, the thresholds are not indexed for inflation, so more taxpayers may be affected as time elapses.

Please contact our office if you would like to discuss the tax consequences to your investments of the new 3.8 percent Medicare tax on investment income.

Close

Many taxpayers are looking for additional sources of cash during these tough economic times. For many individuals, their Individual Retirement Account (IRA) is one source of cash. You can withdraw ("borrow") money from your IRA, tax and penalty free, for up to 60 days. However, the ability to take a short-term "loan" from your IRA should only be taken in dire financial situations in light of the serious tax consequences that can result from an improper withdrawal or untimely rollover of the funds back into an IRA.

The funds must be returned, or rolled back into, an IRA within 60 days from the day after the date of the withdrawal, or income and penalty taxes are imposed on the amount withdrawn and not returned. These tax consequences can be serious. Therefore, it is imperative that you return the withdrawn funds back into an IRA within 60 days.

Tax and interest imposed

If the funds are not returned within 60 days, the withdrawal will not only be treated as a taxable distribution for individuals who are under the age of 59 1/2, but you will also face an additional 10 percent penalty tax, as well as possible state income tax.

Example

You withdraw $10,000 from your IRA on March 2. The 60-day period begins on March 3. To avoid income taxes as a result of early withdrawal treatment and an additional 10 percent penalty tax, the amounts must be returned to an IRA on May 2. Although May 2 falls on a Saturday, there is no extension as a result of weekends (or holidays).

Income tax reporting

If you decide to take the short-term, 60 day "loan" from an IRA you must report the entire amount of the withdrawal. The withdrawal is reported on line 15a of your Form 1040 for the tax year in which you took the withdrawal. If you have returned the withdrawn funds within the 60 day period, you will enter "zero" as the taxable amount of line 15b of Form 1040.

One-year rule

You can only take a "60 day loan" from a specific IRA account and return the funds to that IRA or a different account once during a one-year period. If you make a withdrawal from the same IRA more than once during a one-year period, the second withdrawal is treated by the IRS as a taxable IRA distribution, again generally subject to income taxes and a 10-percent early withdrawal penalty tax.

Moreover, if you redeposit funds back into a particular IRA account and withdraw money from that same account within the one-year period, again the withdrawn funds are again treated as a premature withdrawal subject to income taxes and the 10-percent penalty tax.

For those struggling in these economic times and looking for additional sources of cash, there are other options in addition to a 60-day loan from your IRA. Our office can discuss your options and the potential tax consequences of each.

Close

You have carefully considered the multitude of complex tax and financial factors, run the numbers, meet the eligibility requirements, and are ready to convert your traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. The question now remains, however, how do you convert your IRA?

Conversion basics

A conversion is a penalty-free taxable transfer of amounts from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. You can convert part or all of the money in your regular IRA to a Roth. When you convert your traditional IRA to a Roth, you will have to pay income tax on the amount converted. However, a traditional IRA may be converted (or rolled over) penalty-free to a Roth IRA as long as you meet the requirements for conversion, including adjusted gross income (AGI) limits in effect until 2010. You should have funds outside the IRA to pay the income tax due on the conversion, rather than taking a withdrawal from your traditional IRA to pay for it - those withdrawals are subject to an early withdrawal penalty and they cannot be put back at a later time to continue to accumulate in the tax-free environment of an IRA.

Big news for 2010 and beyond

Beginning in 2010, you can convert from a traditional to a Roth IRA with no income level or filing status restrictions. For 2008, Roth IRAs are available for individuals with a maximum adjusted gross income of $116,000 ($169,000 for joint filers and heads of household). These income limits have prevented many individuals from establishing or converting to a Roth IRA. Not only is the income limitation eliminated after 2009, taxpayers who convert to a Roth IRA in 2010 can recognize the conversion amount in adjusted gross income (AGI) ratably over two years, in 2011 and 2012.

Example. You have $14,000 in a traditional IRA, which consists of deductible contributions and earnings. In 2010, you convert the entire amount to a Roth IRA. You do not take any distributions in 2010. As a result of the conversion, you have $14,000 in gross income. Unless you elect otherwise, $7,000 of the income is included in income in 2011 and $7,000 is included in income in 2012.

Conversion methods

There are three ways to convert your traditional IRA to a Roth. Generally, the conversion is treated as a rollover, regardless of the conversion method used. Any converted amount is treated as a distribution from the traditional IRA and a qualified rollover contribution to the Roth IRA, even if the conversion is accomplished by means of a trustee-to-trustee transfer or a transfer between IRAs of the same trustee.

1. Rollover conversion. Amounts distributed from a traditional IRA may be contributed (i.e. rolled over) to a Roth IRA within 60 days after the distribution.

2. Trustee-to-trustee transfer. Amounts in a traditional IRA may be transferred in a trustee-to-trustee transfer from the trustee of the traditional IRA to the trustee of the Roth IRA. The financial institution holding your traditional IRA assets will provide directions on how to transfer those assets to a Roth IRA that is maintained with another financial institution.

3. Internal conversions. Amounts in a traditional IRA may be transferred to a Roth IRA maintained by the same trustee. Conversions made with the same trustee can be made by redesignating the traditional IRA as a Roth IRA, in lieu of opening a new account or issuing a new contract. As with the trustee-to-trustee transfer, the financial institution holding the traditional IRA assets will provide instructions on how to transfer those assets to a Roth IRA. The transaction may be simpler in this instance because the transfer occurs within the same financial institution.

Failed conversions

A failed conversion has significant negative tax consequences, and generally occurs when you do not meet the Roth IRA eligibility or statutory requirements; for example, your AGI exceeds the limit in the year of conversion or you are married filing separately (note: as mentioned, the AGI limit for Roth IRAs will no longer be applicable beginning in 2010).

A failed conversion is treated as a distribution from your traditional IRA and an improper contribution to a Roth IRA. Not only will the amount of the distribution be subject to ordinary income tax in the year of the failed conversion, it will also be subject to the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty for individuals under age 59 1/2, (unless an exception applies). Moreover, the Tax Code imposes an additional 6 percent excise tax each year on the excess contribution amount made to a Roth IRA until the excess is withdrawn.

Caution - financial institutions make mistakes

The brokerage firm, bank, or other financial institution that will process your IRA to Roth IRA conversion can make mistakes, and their administrative errors will generally cost you. It is imperative that you understand the process, the paperwork, and what is required of you and your financial institution to ensure the conversion of your IRA properly and timely. Our office can apprise you of what to look out for and what to require of the financial institutions you will deal with during the process.

Determining whether to convert your traditional IRA to a Roth IRA can be a complicated decision to make, as it raises a host of tax and financial questions. Our office can help you determine not only whether conversion is right for you, but what method is best for you, too.

Close

Q. My company recently downsized its workforce and eliminated my position. I thought this would be a good opportunity to start my own consulting business in the same industry. What are some of the things I should consider before my last day on the job?

A. Corporate downsizing and restructuring has swelled the ranks of the self-employed in recent years as those employees with an entrepreneurial spirit venture out on their own. Planning ahead for your career change while you are still on the job is a wise move and one that will most likely improve your chances for success.

Know your rights as a former employee. If you plan on bringing any of your current customers/clients with you, make sure you are familiar with the terms of any existing noncompete agreement with your employer. Violating such an agreement can put you out of business before you even get started. Consult an attorney if you are unclear on any of the details. Also confirm what your rights are to unemployment benefits and whether earnings from your new business will reduce or eliminate those rights.

Save for a rainy day. It may take a while to adjust to living without a paycheck while building your new business so make sure you have a decent cash reserve set aside before you leave your job. Many small businesses can take a year or more to become profitable so it pays to be prepared. Restrict expenditures to only items that are absolutely necessary. Consider using credit cards and/or lines-of-credit to buy furniture, inventory and other essentials for your business to conserve cash. The use of credit should, of course, be monitored closely to ensure that you don't get in over your head. Note: arrange for adequate credit before you quit, as the same credit may be difficult to get once you lose your employee status and become self-employed.

Keep your health insurance. Finding the right health insurance as a self-employed individual can take time. If your spouse has insurance through his/her employer, you may be able to be added to that policy. However, if you would like to continue with your current insurance, consider making a COBRA election with your employer to get coverage for up to 18 months following the end of your employment with the company. Contact the benefits department of your company for more information about terms and pricing.

Note. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 alters COBRA coverage for individuals who are involuntarily separated from their employment between September 1, 2008 and January 1, 2010. Eligible individuals may elect to pay 35 percent of his or her COBRA coverage, with the former employer required to pay the remaining 65 percent under a reimbursement arrangement with the federal government.

The decision to go out on your own can be exciting and unsettling at the same time, but if you prepare well before you leave your job, your chances of a smooth transition should greatly increase. Please let us know if you need any assistance or support in this area.

Close

You're 57 years old and as part of an early retirement package, you've just been offered a large cash bonus and salary continuation, along with a lump sum payment from the company retirement plan and continuing medical benefits. Is this a dream come true or a potential financial nightmare?

Corporate downsizing is a fact of life for America's workforce. As companies look to reduce their payroll, many older employees are offered early retirement packages. When faced with the possibility of early retirement, many factors must be considered in order to make an informed decision.

Can you really afford to retire?

If your retirement package is offered to you 10 years before you had planned to retire, you may have to find another job or start your own business in order to make ends meet. In general, you will need between 70 and 80 percent of your pre-retirement salary to maintain your present standard of living once you retire. This can be achieved through a combination of your company pension, Social Security benefits and any other sources of continuing income that you may have. If your health is good and you would like to continue to work elsewhere, maintaining your current lifestyle after early retirement may be possible. You would need to have other sufficient financial resources to draw upon.

Will early retirement negatively affect your long-term retirement benefits?

In many cases, accepting an early retirement package can mean sacrificing some pension benefits. This is because these benefits are usually based on a formula that considers how many years on the job you have and your salary in the last few years of employment. To make your early retirement package more appealing, some employers add years to your age or time on the job when making the calculation. It's important to get educated on how your employer deals with this potentially costly issue.

Is this the best package you can get?

What is the reason behind the company offering you an early retirement package? Is it possible that you may get a larger payoff or more benefits if you were to wait six months or a year? Or do you risk losing your job as part of a larger layoff? Is your company hiring or downsizing? Evaluate the company's motivation for offering you an early retirement plan as part of your decision process to avoid regrets later.

Are you ready to retire?

For some people, going to the office every day gives them a sense of purpose and structure in their life. Once you retire, your familiar daily routine is gone and you must find ways to fill your days. Some people flourish with the extra time now available to pursue their other interests and hobbies such as travel, exercise, or charitable work. For others, though, the loss of routine and structure in their lives can be devastating. If you do not plan to continue working, make sure that you are prepared to change your daily routine when considering early retirement.

Before you decide whether or not to accept an early retirement package, please feel free to contact our office. We would be happy to assist you as you explore your options.

Close

Biweekly mortgage prepayment plans are popular in the mortgage lending industry. These plans tout substantial interest savings and shortened loan terms by making two smaller mortgage payments each month instead of one large payment. Is this type of program right for you? Is a formal plan necessary?

How does it work? Once the plan has been established, a person makes biweekly payments (equal to half of their usual monthly mortgage payment) to the plan operator. This means that a person would make 26 payments instead of the usual 12, effectively making one additional mortgage payment for the year. At the end of the year, the plan operator sends the extra money paid in during the year to the borrower's lender to be applied towards principal.

How much does it cost? Formal prepayment plans typically charge a one-time membership fee of between $300-400. In addition, the plan operator will charge you a service fee of between $1-4 on each payment.

Will it really save me money? Definitely. For example, if you are currently making 12 monthly payments of $665, or $7,980 a year, on your 30-year mortgage, with a formal prepayment plan, you would make 26 biweekly payments of $332.50, or pay $8,645 annually. As a result, total interest paid over the life of the loan would shrink by $34,130 and the loan term would shorten to less than 24 years. But don't forget the annual membership fees and biweekly service charges: these could cost you up to $2,000 over the term of your loan (even after taking into consideration the shortened loan term).

Are there other options? Do it yourself. You can devise your own prepayment plan. This plan does not have to be complicated: take your current monthly payment, divide it by 12 and send the extra amount in with your regular monthly payment. Or just send in one extra payment at the end of the year. You will still reap the benefits without paying any extra administrative fees or getting stuck in a plan you can't commit to for the long term. For example, with a 30-year fixed mortgage for $100,000 at a 7 percent interest rate, a borrower would have monthly principal and interest payments of about $665, and pay $139,508 in interest over the life of the loan. By adding $25 a month, the same borrower could shorten the term by just over three years and save about $18,214 in interest. Sending in even more, say an extra $200 every month, would save $72,695 in interest, and the loan would be paid off in about 16 years. And you've avoided paying the extra fees of almost $2,000.

A couple things to consider before starting any prepayment plan:

Make sure that you follow your lender's procedures for making additional principal payments. You may need to send two checks and write "Principal Only" on one of them or indicate the additional principal payment on your payment voucher.

Watch out for prepayment penalties. These penalties usually only apply when a borrower refinances, but some can be activated if a borrower pays more than 20 percent of the loan's principal during any one year early in the loan. The penalty can be as much as six month's interest on the amount paid that exceeds the lender's allowed prepayment.

Close